On ublock origin (full version, not lite), click on the settings icon:

Then go to “Filter Lists” and enable both of the “Cookie Notices” options:

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    1411 days ago

    Does it only block the pop-up or does it deny consent for anything but necessary cookies?

    Because that’s quite essential I think

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        511 days ago

        In the US, it’s the opposite. The way the law is written, you have to OPT out. So they’re collecting the moment you land.

        I’ve set up a bunch of these cookie banners for US businesses. You can choose if you follow the EU version, or the CCPA version.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          211 days ago

          Fortunately my VPN usually exits from Europe. The internet default to being less of a dick this way

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            0
            edit-2
            10 days ago

            Wouldn’t really matter for most sites hosted in America. American businesses do not have to comply unless they have EU customers.

            International sites like YouTube absolutely has some system that will switch the cookie tracking depending on geo location, from CCPA to GDPR.

            But American sites don’t really gaf. Small News site in America, unless they’re paying for a fancy Cookie Consent Management tool, is doing it the US way and it’s opt out, regardless of where you’re coming from.

            For example: if Kansas News site gets a warning from the EU about cookies, they’re not going to care. They don’t have the budget, and honestly, easier to just block all IPs from outside the US.

            If you hate this, stop using American products and services. (And I say this as a privacy concerned American)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 days ago

        If you don’t click any of the options and simply block the pop-up, it commonly breaks the site. Doesn’t matter what’s ethically right, you have to be practical.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 days ago

            Seriously. I see comments like this all the time but no examples.

            Just the idea that a developer would care so much to create something like “If user doesn’t consent, ruin their experience”.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    911 days ago

    Is there anything for all the “subscribe to newsletter” popups on news sites and online stores?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    811 days ago

    I occasionally do searches to see if there’s a blocker for those obnoxious, “Do you want to use the app?” lightboxes. To no avail. 😿

    • irelephant [he/him]🍭OP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      711 days ago

      You can make your own filters. Press the zap button to temporarily block something (to test) and the eyedropper to permenantly make a filter.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        511 days ago

        I try that in uBlock from time to time, but I still can’t seem to get it quite right. Testing in Duolingo right now, I set it to get rid of the app popup, as well as the semitransparent overlay that darkens the whole page. But there’s still some element on the page that restricts me from scrolling until I tap on the page. It’s an improvement, but still not quite there yet.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 days ago

        I just imported it, and still have to tap before I can swipe. I also checked eBay after importing, and that app banner still pops up.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        211 days ago

        I had to look up ‘html modal’, yeah it sounds like the same thing. I learned web dev back in the xhtml days. Back then those kinds of boxes were only beginning to see popular usage, and there was no official tag for making them.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    411 days ago

    I switched to AdNauseam and can’t tell any difference. And apparently AdNauseam actively is a hindrance to the ads instead of merely blocking them. Can anyone elaborate?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      310 days ago

      That’s basically it, it just creates a ton of traffic from your system by clicking on every ad as it blocks them.

      The idea being you ‘hide in the noise’ essentially. I’m not sure how well that works though.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        310 days ago

        Well so far it blocks everything just as good as ublock as far as I can tell. So if there is even a chance I’m fucking with the advertisers, I’m sticking with it.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      210 days ago

      Kinda depends on your perspective. It costs advertisers money and pays the website you’re visiting. If it’s a shitty site with a lot of ads, you’re effectively encouraging them putting in more ads. Since you’re “clicking” on every ad, and it’s not affecting your experience, it sends a message that stuffing the page with all those ads is good for revenue. It also just charges advertisers. I don’t personally think running ads inherently makes a company bad, so in my opinion clicking on ads out of spite so they get charged for a useless click is kind of not a great solution imho. It seems like it kinda benefits the wrong people, unless you’re exclusively going to great websites running ads for terrible companies.