• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    046 minutes ago

    Oh, I see the psyop is hard at work already. “No, don’t vote, it’s useless, don’t even bother, leave it to those suckers who are doing this stupid ineffective voting thing. Oh, they have all the power all of the sudden? Who knew, no idea how that happened”

    • db0OPM
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      44 minutes ago

      Don’t badjacket. Just because we don’t believe in the electoral farce doesn’t make us a paid actor.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        035 minutes ago

        That’s true, some people repeat the same points for free. This is also bad, it leads to bad outcomes.

        • db0OPM
          link
          fedilink
          033 minutes ago

          100+ years of electoralism and you ended up in fascism anyway. Talk about bad outcomes.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    07 hours ago

    Good thing they’ve got guns to stop terrorist organizations such as ICE. I’m curious when we’ll hear about them being shot at, or worse, though.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    08 hours ago

    I’m very disappointed with Biden’s administration for not charging more people in Trump’s first term for the crimes they committed. They didn’t face any consequences the last time and will now be completely off the rails. Now we have a second Trump administration with most of the same people that now know they can get away with anything.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      07 hours ago

      The problem is that US democracy consists of voting for either a conservative party (Democrats) or a fascist party (Republicans).

      When the conservatives are in power they care most about preserving the appearance of legitimacy of institutions and they don’t do anything like arresting politicians or stuffing the supreme court even though it would strengthen democracy.

      Then the fascists get in and destroy everything anyway.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      018 hours ago

      Avarice and individualism got here.

      To the point many still consider both to be strengths and not the weaknesses they are.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    022 hours ago

    No single thing alone will fix the world. Voting alone won’t fix it. Throwing a molotov alone won’t fix it.

    Voting (in many places, for many people) takes almost no effort. Go do it. But don’t call it a day and think you’ve done everything you can do. Refusing to vote just yields one of the many fronts in this conflict without a fight.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        022 hours ago

        True, true. Saint Luigi inspired people. But that alone didn’t fix the world, and it’s a very chaotic move.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          There are so many murdering copy cats through history, who just wants to ride the coattails of some other psychos fame.

          Where are the Luigi copycats hiding? He got more love than any murderer through history, where are all the psychos who want to feel that?

    • db0OPM
      link
      fedilink
      022 hours ago

      Voting (in many places, for many people) takes almost no effort

      The voting apparatus takes immense effort in fact. It takes so much effort that it’s almost all consuming for most nations during the election period and wastes thousands of human-workhours.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        022 hours ago

        I meant the amount of effort it takes for the end user.

        If we’re going to talk about higher order levels of effort, then everything gets very expensive very quickly.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          08 hours ago

          When I lived in Little Rock, I stood in line to vote for 4.5 hours. There are a lot of places in the US where they make it as difficult as possible. I couldn’t even count how many people left the line to go back to work before they could vote.

        • db0OPM
          link
          fedilink
          022 hours ago

          No, The point is that all that “higher order level” of effort is wasted on electoralism. It’s not wasted in direct action.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            021 hours ago

            Exactly, voting exists to the detriment of any state that implements it. It costs the government billions of dollars. Once we create a socialist paradise, the first thing we should do is abolish elections to save money.

            • db0OPM
              link
              fedilink
              021 hours ago

              I don’t give a fuck about the money

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                021 hours ago

                Money, work-hours, whatever. The only efficient and responsible way to run a socialist economy is with the firm grasp of a centralised authority. Voting doesn’t stop fascism, heroic dictators stop fascism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            021 hours ago

            I’m not sure I follow. I was talking about what individuals should do: direct action and also voting. Voting is often just a few minutes for the end user.

            I’m not talking about what the state should spend resources on.

            • db0OPM
              link
              fedilink
              021 hours ago

              Voting is largely volunteer run. All that effort is wasted. Taking part in elections legitimizes that effort

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                021 hours ago

                Most people follow election results and those people’s actions have real, discernable, effects. If you yield on this front, even if you think elections are flawed, you’re letting your opponents have this power uncontested. That’s a terrible strategy.

                • db0OPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  020 hours ago

                  No, it’s a terrible strategy to waste any effort on elections. If that effort was put in direct action for prefiguration instead, it would not matter what your opponents did.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    024 hours ago

    Perfectly true.

    But anarchism hasn’t exactly been very productive over the last century when it comes to providing alternatives, has it?

    • deaf_fish
      link
      fedilink
      02 hours ago

      Who said anything about anarchism? I’d be happy to just get democracy back.

    • punkisundead [they/them]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      023 hours ago

      Anarchists saved and improved countless lives in the last few years by doing direct action. They rescue(d) and support(ed) refugees, fed people all over the world, setup bail funds and so much more.

      Actually impacting other peoples lives (and your oen) directly is a pretty appealing alternative imo.

    • db0OPM
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      Anarchism has been very productive in improving the lives of those who practice it. Bringing about things like the 40-hour week. Anarchism doesn’t have to become the sociopolitical system to be beneficial. Look into prefiguration and also look at the comm rules.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 hours ago

        Bringing about things like the 40-hour week.

        Can you show me anywhere in the world where anarchism is as strongly represented in labor movements as it was in Spain during the 1930s?

        Looking at the past does not make the present any better.

        Anarchism doesn’t have to become the sociopolitical system to be beneficial.

        So what should it be then? A vanguard in everything but name?

        Look into prefiguration

        I’d love to… but where is it? Every time I ask anarchists this, they point me to social projects such as that happening in northern Syria and Chiappas in Mexico - social projects that reject the anarchist label. And I don’t exactly blame them for rejecting it, either - trying to “preconfigure” something when your theory is too damn orthodox to even allow you to understand what “preconfiguring” should actually look like is a pretty obvious sociopolitical dead-end.

        • db0OPM
          link
          fedilink
          03 hours ago

          Can you show me anywhere in the world where anarchism is as strongly represented in labor movements as it was in Spain during the 1930s?

          Can you show me anywhere in the world where Liberal Capitalist Democracy was strongly represented in 1400s? See how absurd this statement is?

          So what should it be then? A vanguard in everything but name?

          The opposite. Improving the lives of people practicing it in the here and now through anarchist praxis. People can practice direct action for mutual aid right now.

          I’d love to… but where is it?

          Prefiguration is a theory of praxis

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            01 hour ago

            See how absurd this statement is?

            Liberalism is literally the ideology of the status quo now.

            Is it absurd to point that out, too?

            Prefiguration is a theory of praxis

            Soooo… the failure of anarchism to actually preconfigure anything since the end of WW2 in the face of massive liberal counter-insurgency is perhaps tied to anarchist’s theories about preconfiguration not being remotely good enough - if they even exist at all?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    01 day ago

    Everyone agitating for an overthrow of the system through memes is going to get out there and start doing it any day now just you wait…

    Aaaaaaaany day now…

    • db0OPM
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      24 hours ago

      True. What works best is being a smug “nothing ever happens” lib online and doing one political action every 4 years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I mean, that’s what this amounts to. So yeah, I agree.

        Edit: sorry, that’s to say I agree with sarcasm dripping from your reply.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    You think the 90M people that couldn’t be bothered to vote against fascism are going to take to the streets and fight?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      023 hours ago

      Can you point to a single US election where the half the country that never votes magically showed up to vote?

      If not maybe don’t rely on a group of people that will never participate.

    • db0OPM
      link
      fedilink
      01 day ago

      Electoral voting is useless and built to disenfranchise and demotivate people participating from politics. Doing direct action immediately improves your life and builds mutual aid networks. So yes.

        • db0OPM
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          You would get a fascist dictator regardless. That has always been the inevitable path of liberal electoral politics under capitalism.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            01 day ago

            Ah, defeatism. It’s going to happen anyway, so why bother doing anything about it. Great outlook.

            • Fingolfinz
              link
              fedilink
              022 hours ago

              They stated a fact, that not defeatism. WTF is with people getting mad at the messenger all the time

            • Libra00
              link
              fedilink
              English
              01 day ago

              They aren’t saying do nothing, they’re saying do something more useful than voting.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                01 day ago

                And I’m saying not voting is how we got fascism. There were 13M more people that did nothing, than all 77M people who voted for Trump. I don’t expect them to fight unless personally attacked.

                That leaves the ~78M people that collectively voted against Trump. Then remove the sick, disabled, elderly, government, military, and police. We’re not getting anywhere with force unless we can engage the 90M people who couldn’t be inconvenienced to put pen to paper to stop fascism.

                • Libra00
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  0
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  Oh, are you under the impression that there’s a group of liberals (as in liberalism in general) out there that doesn’t coddle and appease and enable fascism that I could vote for? Because Democrats are putting up the most token of resistance at best, and meanwhile voting in support of the right’s shenanigans in congress. Schumer voted for the budget, 4 others voted just the other day for a bill that would effectively disenfranchise millions of women, etc.

                  If you walk into a voting booth and find someone holding a bomb who insists that your only choice for how to deal with it is to choose between a long fuse or a short one, the only sane thing to do is to say ‘Good luck with that’ and leave before you get caught in the blast radius. I voted blue for 30 years and it didn’t get me less fascism, why do you imagine it would suddenly start working today? The fascism is coming from inside the house.

            • db0OPM
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Don’t put words in my mouth. I suggest the opposite of “doing nothing”. Voting is doing nothing every 4 years and expecting things to improve in the face of 100 years of evidence to the contrary.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                0
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I insist that you’re incorrect, based on the simple fact that 77M people voted for a fascist dictator and now we have a fascist dictator. Clearly voting does something, or we wouldn’t have a fascist dictator for president.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 day ago

                  Kinda ignores the reality that the past 3 election cycles have been fascist vs. a party that positions itself as progressive “not fascists.” You’d think that, you know. The “not fascists” would’ve done something to prevent the fascists from gaining power.

                  Instead of endorsing international colonialism and genocide and spending 4 years fighting back against workers’ rights,

                  Electoral liberalism trends towards the right over time. As a rule. Because capitalist interests are always further to the right, and electoral liberalism is based on capitalism and the existence of a capitalist ruling class. Any ideology that permits the existence of capitalism must include very strong limits on capitalist enterprise and absolute bans on capital political power and influence. Or, by default, it becomes more fascist over time. Anti-capitalism is the only ideology congruent with antifascism.

                • db0OPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 day ago

                  Yes, electoral politics inevitably and eventually “does” fascism.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      01 day ago

      People that have everything will not let it go without violence.

      PvP will be required … in Minecraft.