Cross-posted from “A Federal Judge Is on the Brink of Criminally Prosecuting Trump Officials for Contempt” by @[email protected] in [email protected]


In a thundering opinion on Wednesday, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg announced that he had found probable cause to hold the Trump administration in criminal contempt for defiance of his orders. It is “obvious,” Boasberg wrote, that government officials “deliberately flouted” his commands by deporting Venezuelan migrants to a Salvadoran prison on March 15 under President Donald Trump’s invocation of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798. And now they must answer for their unlawful conduct. “The Constitution,” he declared, “does not tolerate willful disobedience of judicial orders—especially by officials of a coordinate branch who have sworn an oath to uphold it.”

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    011 days ago

    Sure he is. Trump will just pardon him. The US president has officially gotten too much power.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Notes: presidential pardon is available for all offenses against the United States. All offenses against the US are tried by a jury. Contempt of court is not tried by a jury. Thus, is pardon available for contempt of court?

      I don’t know. When it’s time, the SC will tell.

      • zqps
        link
        fedilink
        09 days ago

        I have a feeling Trump may have his own opinion on who gets to decide.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      This is as fast a just court can go. If you want it done more quickly, we’ll need Republicans in Congress to find their spines.

      They only have until the 23rd to substantiate their defense before Boasberg charges them. He also states that if Trump’s DoJ refuses to comply, he will appoint an attorney to do so.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          0
          edit-2
          11 days ago

          That’s assuming people actually turn out to the primaries. At least they’re doing what they can to oppose this compared to the Republican enablers.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 days ago

            That’s assuming people actually turn out to the primaries.

            And honest, extant primaries.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              Congressional primaries are honest, they’re just not attended. The average Democratic congressional primary turnout is ~20%. You know who always shows for primaries? Old people, and lots of ‘em.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                0
                edit-2
                10 days ago

                Congressional primaries are honest, they’re just not attended.

                Jessica Cisneros did not face an honest primary. Neither did Cori Bush, nor Jamaal Bowman.

                They faced a party that is openly hostile to progressives, and one that absolutely plays favorites.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              0
              edit-2
              11 days ago

              I have. What vote are you challenging? The CR was not the leverage people say it was. A shutdown would permit Trump to terminate non-essential workers under the lack of funding portion of his emergency executive order. None of the other votes are problematic in that they passed with simple majority and Democrats have minority.

              They did, however, take every opportunity to confirm Biden’s pending judge appointments when Republican attendance was low, prompting Johnson’s push for proxy voting. They also mandated a 15-day vote against Trump’s emergency EO, which prompted Republicans to redefine the congressional calendar to avoid holding. They’re also the ones partnering with the ACLU to bring these cases to the courts, and are now flying to El Salvador to press Bukele into compliance.

              • Maeve
                link
                fedilink
                011 days ago

                They did a lot of public performance, for sure. They also voted yes on confirmation hearings and iirc a couple of other things. But establishment Dems are not our friends. Take what you need, leave the rest.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  0
                  edit-2
                  11 days ago

                  The ones where they all block voted no, the ties were broken by Vance. Like I said, they haven’t tipped a vote that Republicans wouldn’t have won.

                  I’m not a fan of centrist Democrats, but there are many progressives in Congress now, and they’re doing what they can to stop this. Branding them all as the worst of them is ignorant.

    • Admiral PatrickOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      011 days ago

      Sounds like that’s where it’s heading:

      If the government refuses this offer, Boasberg held, it must swiftly identify the officials who violated his orders so they may be criminally prosecuted, facing fines and potential jail time. Critically, Boasberg notes that if the Department of Justice doesn’t appoint a prosecutor to take the case, he will do so on his own.

        • JaggedRobotPubes
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 days ago

          Then you roll over like a bitch while everybody else does what they can to help, but keep quiet next time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        011 days ago

        swiftly identify the officials who violated his orders

        I think this is likely to be the hangup. Everything with this administration is so chaotic and ad-hoc that it might be hard to pin it on a single person or group. If they don’t have beyond-reasonable-doubt certainty that the person they’re holding in contempt is responsible, it’ll probably just get overturned, weakening the bigger Trump v Courts battle.

        • Admiral PatrickOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          011 days ago

          You’re probably not wrong, but hopefully there’s at least a paper trail the judge can work his way up.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            010 days ago

            If any paper trail exists, the government will deny it exists, while concurrently setting fire to it and any other evidence they might have left.

            • Maeve
              link
              fedilink
              011 days ago

              Money was exchanged for humans human resources, in illegal activity.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            011 days ago

            Pretty much this is what I’m worried about. Hopefully the government record keeping laws are robust enough that they can eke out a real answer about responsibility by threatening additional charges over failure to document those.

            • oozynozh
              link
              fedilink
              011 days ago

              assuming they weren’t sent via self-destructing Signal messages, which itself is a violation of records law

    • Codemancer
      link
      fedilink
      011 days ago

      He will just pardon them, there’s no reason not to it not like trump has to face the music.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    0
    edit-2
    9 days ago

    Can’t prosecute Trump because he’s immune. Blanket pardons for his subordinates who break the law on his behalf.

    Yeah, this is a nothingburger. If Congress won’t impeach and remove, it essentially means Trump is a king.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      011 days ago

      Patience young padwan, they need to do this right and carefully, so it fucking sticks in their eye

      • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 days ago

        Amazing how Trump can get what he wants right away, but to get Trump under anything took us years, and didn’t have him rot in jail. Weird how the “justice” system works.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          011 days ago

          That’s how it goes. Turns out you can destroy things a lot faster than you can build them. And you can build things poorly faster than you can build them right

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              0
              edit-2
              10 days ago

              So what are you doing bedside bitching in a community forum in a far darkened corner of the Internet where no one is who they say they are, and there’s no one around that would care if they were.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        010 days ago

        Patience young padwan, they need to do this right and carefully

        This was the line for four years.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        011 days ago

        The last time I fell for that was the Mueller report.

        Show me someone slowly fighting against what is happening and I will show you someone grandstanding, on the take or an idealist out of touch with things

        • ddh
          link
          fedilink
          English
          010 days ago

          I fell for it again with Chutkan and then again with Merchan. People need to go to prison.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          010 days ago

          This could be another one of those, certainly. But if it’s not, then it has to be done right and that will mean slower than we want it to happen. Do it rushed and wrong, it’s going to get undone

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 days ago

            Maybe you’re right, or maybe this is not important at all because there are no effective checks.

            I’m no legal expert, and I don’t understand many things. But it seems to me if there were effective checks, then others would have applied it already.

            My unjustified opinion is that this, if real, is a last gasp by a few patriots who do not see the writing on the wall, and whose actions will largely be forgotten in the chaos to come.

            I hope I’m wrong

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            010 days ago

            The longer it takes the more opportunity Trump has to commit more heinous human rights abuses

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              010 days ago

              She the shorter cuts that are taken will do the same. Do it right or don’t do it at all, that means it might take a while

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      010 days ago

      Even then, who’s going to comply? Who’s going to roll up in there and take people out in cuffs?

      Just another in a long list of judgements written on toiletpaper

  • So what? Do it. Nothing will come of it. Congress sure as hell won’t impeach and remove. Certainly no one will be put in any type of custody.

    Sure. Do it for the record. Unfortunately it’s meaningless for the foreseeable future.

    • Match!!
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      So what: we have to protect this judge and act as deputies to enact his rulings or else the system collapses in favor of monarch Trump and 4chancellor Musk

      • Oh yeah? What’s your plan for that? You volunteering to stand guard at his home with enough weapons to protect him?

        How will you help take those that face charges into custody?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      If members of his administration are convicted of crimes for following his orders, their replacements may not be as willing to overstep the law.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      I can’t believe people still believe in the courts. It’s insane to watch from the outside. You enshrined a dictator who has proven many times in the past that he has no regard for the courts at all.