fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoWater Snekmander.xyzimagemessage-square116linkfedilinkarrow-up1673arrow-down15
arrow-up1668arrow-down1imageWater Snekmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square116linkfedilink
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19·1 month agoNo, there were probably waves.
minus-squareCodpiece@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down1·1 month ago+1 for pedantry. I’ve edited my comment to add an Oxford comma, because I know everyone likes those.
minus-squareteft@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·edit-21 month agoThat’s not an Oxford comma. Oxford commas (also known as serial commas) are for lists that contain more than three terms. You should just replace the “and waves” with “but there are waves” or something like that.
minus-squareSpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month agoNow it’s worse. “Waves and no road” is what you’re looking for.
No, there were probably waves.
+1 for pedantry.
I’ve edited my comment to add an Oxford comma, because I know everyone likes those.
That’s not an Oxford comma. Oxford commas (also known as serial commas) are for lists that contain more than three terms.
You should just replace the “and waves” with “but there are waves” or something like that.
“waves and no road”
Now it’s worse.
“Waves and no road” is what you’re looking for.