ickplant@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 2 months agoGeniuslemmy.worldimagemessage-square68linkfedilinkarrow-up1762arrow-down18
arrow-up1754arrow-down1imageGeniuslemmy.worldickplant@lemmy.world to Fuck AI@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square68linkfedilink
minus-squareDrew@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·2 months agonah, training data is not why it answered this (otherwise it would have training data from many different years, way more than of 2025)
minus-squarequeermunist she/her@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5·edit-22 months agoThere’s data weights for recency, so after a certain point “next year is 2026” will stop being weighted over “next year is 2027” It’s early in the year, so that threshold wasn’t crossed yet.
minus-square0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 months agoMaybe it uses the most recent date in the dataset for its reference to datetime?
nah, training data is not why it answered this (otherwise it would have training data from many different years, way more than of 2025)
There’s data weights for recency, so after a certain point “next year is 2026” will stop being weighted over “next year is 2027”
It’s early in the year, so that threshold wasn’t crossed yet.
Maybe it uses the most recent date in the dataset for its reference to datetime?