• BanMe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    And fuck all the people who have worked peacefully for it in the ensuing over half a century?

    We owe Stonewall a lot - birthplace of the modern LGBTQ rights movement - but this is the second time I’ve seen it equated with marriage equality, which… yeah you’re erasing a LOT of advocates lives and work, a lot of queer history.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yeah the right to marry came from decades of fighting by a lot of activists and a sweet old man from Ohio who was willing to go to the supreme court about how his relationship was treated unfairly.

      The riots were how we stopped bar raids.

      Diversity of tactics is how we won and how we win

      • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        Thank you. This is the real shit. Let’s spend a lot less time policing other people on our side and a lot more time getting more people to do literally anything. Wear every silly hat, write every Congress-critter, throw every brick. Fire everything!

        • WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 days ago

          If you’re an American in February 2026 who isn’t throwing bricks, and you aren’t MAGA, you haven’t taken a side. Get off the fence.

    • cassandrafatigue@lemmy.dbzer0.comBanned
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      5 days ago

      peacefully

      Which made graceful capitulation to the motive force much driving our rights more palatable as it allowed the powerful to save face. Nonviolemt action in the context of a larger movement is not useless.

      But without a violent wing nonviolent action is worth less than nothing. Straight masochism.

    • skisnow@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I’ve grown to hate the word “erasing” because it gets misused by people overreacting far more often than it’s used reasonably.

      It’s a single photo and you’re criticising it for not being a comprehensive detailed history of everyone who ever did anything. Can you just let one thing not be about you.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 days ago

      And fuck all the people who have worked peacefully for it in the ensuing over half a century?

      and pointlessly so, biden has given anyone permission for any gov’t official to refusal to certify or recognize a marriage by simply saying that it’s against their religion.

      and it will be reversed without more bricks.

      • PugJesus@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        and pointlessly so, biden has given anyone permission for any gov’t official to refusal to certify or recognize a marriage by simply saying that it’s against their religion.

        I love that you combine the assertion of pointlessness of basic human fucking rights with outright misinformation.

        But if you had to rely solely on facts and morally sound arguments, you wouldn’t have anything.

          • PugJesus@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            biden has given anyone permission for any gov’t official to refusal to certify or recognize a marriage by simply saying that it’s against their religion.

              • PugJesus@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 days ago

                I’m sure you have a source, then, considering the pre-Biden standing legal precedent that a government official can’t refuse to certify or recognize a marriage on religious grounds, and the Respect of Marriage Act signed into law by Biden forbidding any state or territory of the US from refusing to recognize lawful marriages.

                • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  the source is the act itself; dig deeper into it:

                  “Diverse beliefs about the role of gender in marriage are held by reasonable and sincere people based on decent and honorable religious or philosophical premises. Therefore, Congress affirms that such people and their diverse beliefs are due proper respect.”

                  – The Respect for Marriage Act (H.R. 8404) Section 2

                  “shall not be required to provide services, accommodations, advantages, facilities, goods, or privileges for the solemnization or celebration of a marriage. Any refusal under this subsection…shall not create any civil claim or cause of action.”

                  – The Respect for Marriage Act (H.R. 8404) Section 6(b)

  • AeronMelon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    4 days ago

    And to quote the movie directly:

    “Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses!”

  • decapitae@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 days ago

    The illegitimate tRump court is not supreme - there is a process and they’ve skipped some important parts - impeachment, removal, and prosecution should help!

  • Duamerthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords may not be a basis for a system of government, but trans women distributing bricks may be.