• heartSagan5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 days ago

    Whoever wins AI, wins.

    Meanwhile, it pillages electrical, water, and construction resources away from populouses and it adds noise and light pollution while granting few jobs in return. People were okay with factories that paid, but this? No.

  • drolex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 days ago

    Word count: 126

    All caps words: 15 (excluding acronyms)

    All caps ratio: 11.9%

    Unnecessarily capitalised words: 9

    Unnecessarily caps ratio: 7.1%

    Exclamation marks: 12

    Quotes: 4

    Pants shid: 2 (estimate)

    Unhingeness level: 7/10

  • NormalHumanBreathing@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    7 days ago

    I’d just settle for one that doesn’t shit himself, doesn’t lie, doesn’t touch kids, doesn’t start pointless wars, doesn’t upset the entire world economy, isn’t a cry baby, is smart. You know, basically anyone else.

  • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    So even if this were true, isn’t that like… Really bad? That our safety regarding AI lies solely on the IQ of one man? That changes every 4 to 8 years?

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    None of the AI bond villain statements this weekend have any policy recommendations that would slow US military/surveillance/gestapo/bond villain use of LLM/AI tools. They are only promoting/perfecting the guardrails on models that are released to the public.

    Who wins AI, Wins

    Can only be understood as a race for skynet. Any production/productivity benefit from AI made by Americans, can be enhanced by access to more models on price/speed/performance curve. The data centers can all run open models too, and somehow this only growing part of US economy can get more ROI with access to best/cheapest models.

    Therefore, winning is not based on helping people the most. It is an open declaration, and based on killing/oppressing people the most. The previous administration viewed global warming as an opportunity to beat China in profifting from its technology sector to pursue green energy. There is massive employment opportunities from just deploying whatever is the cheapest/abundant available green energy in far higher volume because the savings/payback is that much more attractive.

    The only reason 30+ year solar energy, and 20+ year EV lifetimes are “falsely demonized as foreign dependence”, when 1 year replacement shoes/apparel are not, is the oligarchy controlling your propaganda to protect their profits. All industry is moving towards more automation and less employment.

    Nationalist rivalry policy thought must be exterminated. Only way to avoid skynet. Policy that focuses on making the nation the best possible place to live is what creates national prosperity, and extreme employment for anyone wanting a share of that prosperity growth. https://naturalfinance.blogspot.com/2026/09/a-global-prosperity-manifesto.html

  • FoxAlive@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 days ago

    The only bad things that hes referencing that anthropic did, is they refused to allow the military to use their Ai to be used in autonomous kill weapons, and be used as survalience against the people of the united States.

    And anthropic still does both of those things lol. So if those are the bad guys, you can only immagine what the good ai “people” do. Which is assist in the genocide in Gaza, help surveil the people who don’t like it, and generate pro us, pro ai propaganda for his friends media companies like Jeff bezos. If you don’t like the fact trump made it illegal for the states to regulate ai in anyway (including generating ai csam), then you are a anti tech extremist, terrorist, and traitorist.