• GaryGhost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Go for it, they will choose the most inexperienced losers and it will blow up in their face. Like the doctored Epstein footage with the movie maker marks

  • switcheroo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    Early voters are reporting some hijinks when selecting their choice so be VERY CAREFUL about confirming who you are voting for.

    I know I am going to be checking in to make sure my vote was counted and counted for the people I want to win. You should to.

  • YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    It’s the old projection thing again.

    Republicans: the Dems hacked voting machines and stole the election! Lock them up!

    Also Republicans: we hacked a voting machine so we can steal the election.

  • encelado748@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    They want to find vulnerabilities, even vulnerabilities that you cannot use or that you have no evidence are getting used, to justify canceling the vote later.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    16 days ago

    There is no such thing as security if you have physical access to the device. So yes, I am sure they could “hack” it. (Remove storage, alter the votes, re-insert storage).

    That doesn’t mean elections are compromised. It means one machine is compromised.

    • _chris@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      The storage had better be encrypted and locked to the machine it was installed on. It’s such a basic thing that…shit, yep they probably didn’t do it.

  • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    The first stone has fallen out of the wall. I hope it leads to more. If you look at the various numerical anomalies that occurred in swing states only, it becomes very plausible that Harris actually won.

    • Mail-in votes closely reflected polling, but election-night voting (i.e. on the machines) contradicted the polls.
    • Split-ticket voting occurred much more often than usual - in this case, ballots with a vote for Trump and votes for Democrats the rest of the way. This does happen in elections, but not nearly to the degree it happened in the swing states.
    • The anomalies were always enough for Trump to win, but just below the thresholds that would trigger automatic audits.
    • Nindelofocho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Can we start compiling the evidence this stuff somewhere? Like I definitely believe voting got fucked up but whenever I want to talk about it to someone or bring attention to it I struggle to find a good resource for it.

      Quick edit: And I struggle to keep my facts straight particularly because im super busy but also because of lack of solid reference

      • Lovable Sidekick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Somebody must be but I don’t know who. The things I listed came from a statistician who had various graphs and charts with historical data, illustrating why the voting was “anomalous”. I don’t remember his name and can’t find him now. All he could do was show how the data, particularly the precision with which anomalous Trump votes were just enough to win but not too much, that painted a picture of someone carefully adjusting the vote on election night. The voting machines also had automated operating system updates shortly before the election, and additional updates shortly after, creating a plausible scenario of software hacks being inserted and removed. So far there has been no hard evidence that anything happened, but the more people who are involved in something the more likely it is that things will happen between them later that motivate some to come forward.

  • Havatra@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Voting machines are vulnerable just like any other machine, and have been proven time and time again that they’re not particularly difficult to hack. DEF CON has been doing it for almost ten years at this point. First time in 2017, with lots of articles covering it. The year after even TIME reported about how an 11 year old did it. In 2024 they got some attention again due to Trump going for second term. But I don’t think much came of it…

    The US is a flawed democracy, and has been on a steady decline for years.

    • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      funny how the machines are solelyused in only republican areas. in the west its all paper ballots. wether thats from mail in or in person.

      • floofloof@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Maybe it’s more: funny how areas that use voting machines come up Republican.

    • Redfugee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      I worry that comments like this can degrade the confidence in the system.

      States run their own elections and they’re usually administered at the county level. I can’t speak for any other county but the way we do elections here are legit. This system is audited and administered by bipartisan teams. During elections I work with people from different parties and facilitate a system to ensure our voting process maintains integrity.

      If you don’t know how elections are administered where you live I encourage you to take an interest and get involved. We all have a duty here to oversee that we are administering elections with integrity.

      • Havatra@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        The system is made up of many components, and voting machines are but one part. Even though they might be hackable in various ways, there are much more efficient ways these days to sway an election. The Cambridge Analytics scandal proved one efficient way, while there’s now a growing belief that whoever controls the social media algorithm effectively controls public opinion.
        And don’t get me started on the two-party-system in the US…

        So no need to hack the machines, really. The system is flawed/corrupt elsewhere more severely.

      • story@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        I’m sorry to say this to you. It wasn’t difficult to make a voting machine in 2011. What we have are fraud machines. It’s just politically impossible to make a secure voting machine, even though it’s technically trivial.

        • limer@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          15 days ago

          Most democracies do not use voting machines because it’s impossible to trust anyone with creating and maintaining it.

          If there is a way to change the vote tallies, then clever people will use it to enrich themselves.

          The only way to circumvent most cheating is by paper ballots recounted manually in front of representatives of all candidates: recounted as many times as asked; and the ballots must be kept in public view until a winner is declared.

          Putting the ballots into any other device negates some or all of the above.

          And I would only have to say this in American political posts. But Americans are married to voting in ways that cannot be verified, except in some states. So most likely what’s seen as common sense in most of the world is either ignored or viewed with suspicion here.

          Ask any student in the uk though; and I’m just echoing what has been taught in school to young children

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Ironically, the initiative was reportedly complicated by the fact that Elon Musk’s DOGE squad had laid off the CISA agents who would have known how to actually break into voting machines.

    Article casually assuming that some vulnerability existed to exploit. The more journalistically-responsible way to phrase it would’ve been something more like “the CISA agents with expertise who might have been able to find a way to break into voting machines.”

  • Burn_The_Right@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Now why in the world would they want to do that? For educational purposes only, I presume. Fascists are famously pro-education.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    Providers of voting machines have skewed GOP in their donations since Bush 43. Variations of voting results from polling have been strongest in Ohio and Florida.

    Obviously this is yet more extreme corruption, but election rigging is possible/likely happening without this embarrassment. Vote rigging is more subtle than buffoon in chief thinks it should be.

    • Gibibit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      15 days ago

      Excuse me? The companies that make voting machines donate to a political party? Please tell me you’re joking

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        15 days ago

        The guy that ran the voting machines in the 2004 elections, and before, Diebold was the company name I believe, was a big Bush supporter and was on record saying he would do anything to help the republicans win.

        This is nothing new, and you can draw a straight line from the successful stealing of the 2000 electon to 2020.

  • joeschmoe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    14 days ago

    Yeah, this election is gonna be stolen for sure… And guess what, Muricans will do nothing about it. They will throw their hands in the air and say “well, I tried”.

    They already should have done something when their brain dead / brainwashed compatriots elected a CHILD-RAPING FELON, but nope. Sure, he was (possibly) “fairly” elected, that doesn’t mean you can’t show your “dissatisfaction” for it.

    • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      14 days ago

      I never understand the point of the “But he was elected fairly” angle. So was Vladimir Putin as far as anyone can tell, so was Adolf Hitler, so was Stalin, the only major dictator of the last century that I can think of that definitely seized power through illegitimate means is Castro I suppose you could also make an argument for the CCP but certain people refute that.

      Most dictators become dictators over time, the vast majority don’t grab power from a legitimate government because they would instantly have a fight on their hands. Usually that only happens with the US’s assistance.

      • kunaltyagi@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        14 days ago

        Tolerance requires intolerance against intolerance.

        Democracy needs a fast and sure actions against dictators and fascists, not soft words and long tedious processes

  • Jason2357@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    15 days ago

    As much as I would want to cry foul, this sound like a typical red team exercise.