Proposition 40, which will be on the ballot in November, would impose a one-time, 5% tax on California’s 200 billionaires,

These fucks will do anything to avoid paying taxes…

with 90% of the revenue from the proposed measure going toward the state’s health care program and 10% going toward education, food assistance, and administration. Brin, with a net worth of nearly $260 billion, could owe about $13 billion as a result of the tax.

Can’t be contributing to “socialism” I guess? Get some of that $260 billion liquid and pay up, dickhead.

  • dudeface@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    There is plenty of millionaires that want to be taxed more, billionaire wealth hoarders are psychopaths though

      • dudeface@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        Millionaires aren’t really contributing, it would cost them more than what it’s worth, unless you are working towards billionaire level wealth

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          30 days ago

          Millionaires aren’t really contributing

          The multimillionaire used car dealer, the retired middle manager, and the seventh generation family money failson make up the backbone of the party going back to the Hoover Era.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      That have so much wealth that they wouldn’t even notice and it would help with finding that were cut by Big Billionaire Bill. Including social net.

      But yeah, fuck us, fuck our children and grandchildren.

      If your are in California, please vote yes on prop 40, and vote NO on prop 41 and 42 (Trojan horses placed by Sergey that would block prop 40 even if it passes)

    • Fishnoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      We need to make readily available MANPAD blueprints using easily obtained materials.

      There is no private jet that shouldn’t be shot out of the sky. You don’t need billions to make rich people live in fear. You just need labor.

  • Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    There is enough for all, the scarcity is fake and controlled by the wealthy, to maintain their place at the top, in this punching down system they invented. Read a summary of Democracy In Chains to learn more and all the propaganda they used to fool the public for decades with coordinated lies and distraction to keep their wealth and prejudice safe.

    If this wins and not struck down or delayed for ages, it’s supposed to bring income over five years with delayed payments so they can sell stuff lol.

  • IamMoonPie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Or… and hear me out here… we take his money away from him and leave him in a deep pit on a small uninhabited island.

    • Napster153@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      Imaginary money. By this point, their only still a hpper class because the pedestal under them hasn’t collapsed.

  • Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    I dont care how many billions he’s gonna lose

    It’s literally a one-time 5% tax.

    The more money they scream they’re gonna lose the more I can see them afford to pay

      • smeenz@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        29 days ago

        That likely isn’t sustainable, unless their wealth always grows back and exceeds the tax they paid, by the following year. Also, this sort of tax policy tends to have a negative impact on the speculation market that creates that growth in the first place.

        I’m not defending billionaires here, I’m just highlighting the mathematics of doing it every year.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    30 days ago

    Do they all just have the most generally punchable faces? Or do their faces just become our idea of what is punchable?

  • Suavevillain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    It is amazing the amount of money and effort Billionaires put into avoiding paying taxes. They aren’t hated enough.

  • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    A one-time money infusion is terrible policy. I support it because taxes should be re-distributive, but there is no way to budget a sustainable social policy that way. If the tax policy was more progressive and most importantly assessed annually (and nationally) it would be a huge win.

    • explodicle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      29 days ago

      Could we just vote on it every year? Then it might be more resistant to corruption. Certainly not gratis and not perfect, though.

  • VibeSurgeon@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    29 days ago

    He already changed his tax residency before the cutoff so that he would owe $13b if the law passes is not really accurate

  • TeaWithDani@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s just 5% of his wealth. Most people give anything from 20% to 50% of their annual income to taxes and will pay income taxes on all their retirement savings when they pull it.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      30 days ago

      I’d gladly pay 5% of my total wealth once in lieu of taxes. It’d amount to about $50. Granted all of society would grind to a fucking half if us workers weren’t paying taxes because the other leeches fucking aren’t.