• Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Yes, I agree, which would disagree with the other comment’s point that socialism inherently opposes individualism.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 month ago

        As much as i know, anarchy is not indivualist since the entire point of anarchism should be that the community works togheter to do stuff

        • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          While respecting the rights and autonomy of the individual. It is entirely about respecting individual freedom while also encouraging work together as a community.

          • Cosmoscos ☭@lemmy.todayBanned from community
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            so its a fell good circlejerk with no framework on how to organize and overthrow capitalism. Hah

            • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 month ago

              Tell me you know nothing about Anarchist philosophy or history with explicitly saying so.

              ![“The ultimate goal of our oppressors is to limit our imagination about what is possible without them, so that we might never imagine more for ourselves and the world we live in. We can only imagine what is in front of us because the power structure decrees that there are no alternatives other than what currently exists. We humans have lived the alternative for tens of thousands of years. We are capable of building a free society, a brighter future, because we already have ideas about what that might look like. We know what societies without bureaucracies are capable of.”

              — David Graeber, cultural anthropologist](https://slrpnk.net/pictrs/image/84d97534-b030-4f03-9732-7e73c587306b.png)

              • Cosmoscos ☭@lemmy.todayBanned from community
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 month ago

                you still didnt explain

                • How would you organize people and overthrow the bourgeosie state?
                • How would you maintain siginificant resistance against foreign imperialist attacks without some kind of heirarchy?
                • How would you incentivize people to actually work in jobs which dont have good reputation?
                • How would you counter reactionary tendencies and stop reactionary mobilization?

                This whole quote seem like motivation speech

                • Doc_Crankenstein@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 month ago

                  Try reading a book and you’ll get those answers explained in full. I’m not gonna sit here and paraphrase volumes of anarchist theory just so you can play judge nitpicking the specifics. I have explained my position well enough. If you want specifics, go read the source materials.

                  Kropotkin, Graeber, Bakunin, Proudhon, Luxembourg, Parsons, etc … All have explained the mechanisms of decentralized resistance and horizontally structured systems of authority as well as the incentive structures of how people decide what to labor on and organize with their communities to ensure desired services are rendered alongside how this change of incentives and authoritative structure would counteract reactionary efforts.

                  FYI, that quote is from renowned anthropologist, David Graeber, who wrote multiple books on these very subjects. You should try reading them. You’ll learn something.