It’s so funny to me that they keep degrading their argument to things that are just objectively worse to try and paint me as the one that is misinterpreting their arguments. We went through

• “That isn’t what he says in the ad” -> https://lemmy.zip/post/73859928/29637695
• “Ok that’s what he says but he doesn’t mean ‘everyone’ only trans kids (this is somehow ok and totally not transphobic). He is responding to a republican attack ad from June (? lmao). Actually he supports preferred pronouns in schools, he supports hormone blockers for minors, he supports adults having surgery.” -> https://lemmy.zip/post/73859928/29638812
• “So he does actually mean it like that but only to trick red voters. However if we take what you understand as ‘male’ and not how the phrase is commonly used it isn’t transphobic” -> https://lemmy.zip/post/73859928/29639358
• “No I don’t have any proof of this but you don’t either so…” -> https://lemmy.zip/post/73859928/29639609
• “Well you’re only posting his own ad as proof to spread republican propaganda” -> https://lemmy.zip/post/73859928/29639695
• “You just assume that he used in the way that everyone understands it even though I keep telling you about how I understand it” -> https://lemmy.zip/post/73859928/29639695
• “All I’m saying is that there is possibility that this guy isn’t a transphobe…” -> https://lemmy.zip/post/73859928/29640383

I keep arguing against the stronger claim and they’re then trying to pull a “you keep not understanding me, I meant <thing that’s even less convincing>!!!” 🤣