- 1 Post
- 21 Comments
Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Hmm this "unisex" bathroom seems biased...
3·3 个月前This is the correct answer
Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Autism@lemmy.world•Any other neurospicy people get this?English
32·5 个月前No that’s very executive dysfunction coded
Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Curated Tumblr@sh.itjust.works•on the male loneliness epidemicEnglish
35·5 个月前I agree that we need to treat men (and indeed everyone, we’re all victims) with compassion and care. However, I think these conversations often turn into tone policing our own community more than those who attack it
In progressive spaces, we need to make room for anger and negative emotion because they are how we express the injustices of the world. The problem is, how do we allow people to express that anger safely, without causing harm. To that, I don’t know the answer, but I have personally found art quite helpful
Idk, I’m trying to also be sympathetic to that anger because it often comes from a place of hurt
Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
LinkedinLunatics@sh.itjust.works•Using sexism for engagementEnglish
9·9 个月前Also practices like that reinforce the gendered division of labour. As men get jobs, women are usually left to pick up the slack of care responsibilities. This leaves them financially dependent on those men. So both men and women suffer, but the system leaves women with less agency than men.
(Also nonbinary, queer, and third gender people are treated even worse)
Europeans use metres
I agree with the idea that rights are weird. The history of rights is rooted in law. A right is enforced by a state or similar entity. Freedom can exist outside of institutional power but rights historically require it.
That said, most people who advocate for rights are not much concerned about who will enforce those rights. It’s often used more as a synonym for freedom. As with all social constructs, there is no material reality behind it
Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•About to turn the car to a flying car
33·1 年前That’s Sean Connery referring to James Bond’s profession
Me buying 1000000000 tampons right now
Except carcinnisation only happens in some crustaceans, so it’s less a universal thing and more a selective pressure
Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Android@lemmy.world•Free and open-source YouTube clients w/ no adsEnglish
8·2 年前Using Tubular, which is a fork of newpipe with sponsorblock integration. It’s a bit buggy but I like not having to skip every sponsor
“Orcas were given the name ‘killer whale’ by ancient sailors’ observations of groups of orcas hunting and preying on larger whale species. They called orcas ballena asesina, or ‘killer whale.’ Their Latin name, Orcinus orca, also reflects this observation of orcas feeding on large whales. Orcinus translates to ‘of the kingdom of the dead,’ and orca refers to a kind of whale.”
Source: https://us.whales.org/whales-dolphins/facts-about-orcas/
So seems like this etymology makes more sense.
Clicked just to listen to it again
Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
politics @lemmy.world•New House Speaker Tells Hannity, ‘Go Pick Up a Bible Off Your Shelf and Read It – That’s My Worldview’
2·2 年前It’s cus he was a wealthy Roman citizen of the time while the Apostles were mostly poor Palestinians
Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.world•Spotify Removes Offensive Imagery But Keeps Transphobic Song Despite OutcryEnglish
31·2 年前To use a trolley problem metaphor, what they are saying is not pulling the lever is the same as allowing five people to die. If fascism is progressing and you do not stop it, you are allowing it to progress. Whether you consider that propagation comes down to your ethical framework, but from a consequentialist view it is accurate
Si_sierra@lemmy.blahaj.zoneto
Technology@lemmy.world•Spotify Removes Offensive Imagery But Keeps Transphobic Song Despite OutcryEnglish
4·2 年前The strongest argument I can come up with for why this should go is that it violates Spotify’s explicit policy on hate speech, inciting hatred against trans people. They remove other stuff that violates, and they were aware this did, as they removed them album artwork, so them deliberately not removing the song isn’t a lack of action, but an action of discrimination in and of itself
If others want to argue that shouldn’t be Spotify’s policy, we can have that discussion, but if we only have that discussion when trans people are brought up then the discussion was never about free speech and thus arguing platforms, censorship, and tolerance paradoxes is moot. It’s just tone policing
Their planning is for the week
This is actually one of his dogwhistle tactics. He makes some comics that are more vague on his political beliefs and some that are explicit, so that he still gets algorithm boosts






Adding to this, consent also depends on what you are consenting to and the risks that it entails. It’s one thing for a teenager to decide to do a low risk activity, but sex carries many risks such as pregnancy, STDs, and emotional distress from a poorly defined boundary being crossed. An adult can make an educated decision that understands these risks but a teenager is not equipped to do so