• 2 Posts
  • 73 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: February 27th, 2025

help-circle
rss


  • Is America the only country on the planet?

    You seem to forget that the EU and China are starting to mingle; and that China is heavily involved in Africa et al via the Belt&Road Initiative.

    Obviously everyone gets hurt in it a trade war, that’s why it’s called a war. But the the long term outlook for China is significantly better than America’s - they will win a war of attrition.

    China is also doing their due diligence. Tit-for-tat is the most effective negotiation strategy, you will not beat physics, and they understand this.

    The craziest part is that both America and China were benefiting immensely off of the status quo, considering they were the #1 and #2 richest countries on the planet. But since the least qualified person on the planet to handle money (Trump) has unregulated power, it has all gone to shit.




  • @green@feddit.nltoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldsurely
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    I’ve noticed that many of these cruel and reactionary ideologies are not based in any historical data nor science. This is used to be called hysteria.

    They still haven’t answered either; so I can only assume they did not realize the contradiction between accelerationism and paying more taxes. Sad times we live in.



  • It’s not about “hating”. It is because you (and the current administration) have no idea what you are talking about and are trying to pass it off as fact.

    People really do not like imposters, larpers, and pretenders - and when in positions of power they get people killed. This is not a video game, nor a simulation, educate yourself before you speak.

    There are many many expert peer-reviewed studies that show tariffs do not work - especially in the way Trump is using them. Also the U.S. had no “economic failure”, they’ve been the richest country to ever exist. BlackRock and Vanguard also manage a significant amount of U.S. property assets and they are American companies.

    The problem was the wealth-gap and no amount of tariffs is going to fix this; people need to pay their taxes. Companies need to be paying the 91% rate they paid in the past, and people need the minimum wage to rise with inflation.

    There is more than enough money to do this, but you vote for Trump who actively makes the situation worse. This is not to say Dems would’ve made it better - but Republicans will always make the problem worse, since that is their whole policy platform.


  • You’re okay with more taxes, but you’re an accelerationist…

    What does accelerationism mean to you? And what benefits do you believe society gains from this?

    P.S. For the sake of transparency, I’m not liberal; but you can call me whatever you like.



  • I get what the founders were talking about now. A lot of people really shouldn’t be able to vote if you want a functioning society. They just chose the wrong metric.

    If you run a market and take a cut of every sale, you will make infinitely more profit than selling items yourself. This is exactly the position the U.S. was in - which is why it became the richest country in human history.

    You also argue that the U.S. is getting “exploited” because they aren’t the ones doing the selling. But who cares? I’ll tell you who, people who don’t know wtf they are talking about.

    In your infinite wisdom, the better choice is saddling yourself with more risk and less rewards because “the vibe” feels better.





  • @green@feddit.nltoFediverse memes@feddit.ukOf course
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    21 days ago

    So people also use the term “news provider”? What about “email channel”? This argument falls apart fairly quickly with any level of scrutiny.

    The English language has connotations. Certain words are more likely to be paired with others due to cultural or historical reasons. “Instance” has a medical and technical connotation; and Lemmy is a technology (software). News is not technical, so it is unlikely (but still correct) to use the word “instance” with it.

    Email is more of a service than a technology, so due to connotation, it is often paired with “provider”. However, “email instance” is still a completely correct phrase.

    Once again, we should not be calling fundamentals of the English language “gatekeeping”. This is how you get widespread ignorance and shitty communities.

    P.S. Also, your “no one outside of Lemmy” argument is also just wrong. Invidious, Redlib, and other frontends refer to themselves as instances. Bluesky calls itself an instance. And it is very common to use the term for weather services as well.


  • @green@feddit.nltoFediverse memes@feddit.ukOf course
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    22 days ago

    Can we make it okay for humans to use their brains again?

    The term “instance”, in this context, means exactly what it says - it is one existence of many. How is this gatekeeping or jargon?

    This implies to me that the “gatekeeping” you are referring to is reading comprehension and basic vocabulary; and frankly, if we’ve stooped that low, keep them out. There is nothing to be gained from a group that refuses to learn the basic definition of the word “instance”.

    P.S. “provider” is a good (and correct) term as well.



  • I read the thread you linked. I’m so fucking tired boss.

    What do you even do in this situation? The algorithms and propaganda networks are all controlled by fascists and people don’t care. Beyond not caring, they refuse to even protect themselves from being targeted in this way - they do not value privacy nor integrity.

    So what do you do? We have to figure something out.


  • Agreed. There are many facets to this problem, so it’s difficult to get in one post, so I’ll try to reconcile the main points.

    The core of what I’m trying to say, is don’t kill Linux trying to become Windows. Linux is great because it diverse, but it also has difficulties because of this. We should not change (nor destroy) the ecosystem for people who do not care to understand it.

    That being said, we can also make it easier for people who do care and cooperate to make it over. But if we do this we, as Linux users, have to look at this from the right lens. The question is not “Linux users, what do you find difficult?”; this is survivorship bias. The question is “Windows users, why can’t you get Linux on your machine?”. From this framing, the real issues become a lot more apparent:

    • Not savvy enough to set up USB stick
    • Driver, and other hardware, issues
    • Programs needed for work, or general daily usage, are unavailable
    • Too much tinkering required (this is related to, but not the same as RTFM and CLI)

    The first two points can be solved by purchasing a machine from a Linux OEM (i.e System76). If this is not possible, then you are going to have to do research; if this burden is too heavy, Linux is not for you.

    AI has a good and valid use-case here, as it can significantly ease this process (even if it’s only right 60% of the time).


    Linux may not have an alternative for your preferred programs; if this burden is too heavy, Linux is not for you.

    Developers should follow open guidelines (i.e POSIX). If they refuse to, there is nothing Linux can (nor should) do about it.


    The last point can be solved by distro choice, we completely agree here. The problem is finding said distro, which is difficult. For example, I’ve never heard of Ublue until your post. I appreciate distros that handle defaults and don’t push breaking changes. The community can make this better by having a dedicated website (with a decision tree) for choosing a distro, but this has its own set of issues.

    No matter, the responsibility falls on the user to pick the right distro; if this burden is too heavy, Linux is not for you.


  • @green@feddit.nltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldLinux is too hard
    link
    fedilink
    English
    10
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    Linux Mint is a great distro, and I’m happy it works for you.

    In terms of mass-adoption though, the fatal point is probably putting a Linux ISO on a thumb drive. Like I said prior, we must be aware of survivorship bias. You don’t care much for the terminal - but you made it through.

    The people that didn’t make it through probably failed from the thumb drive step. I only say this from personal experience, because when I first installed Linux, I was very determined and came extremely close to giving up at this step. And I only got through because I happened to find an obscure forum about how Rufus needed a special setting for my machine.

    P.S. I also was not tech savvy, but I wasn’t completely lost either - and I still struggled really hard here.