• 1 Post
  • 508 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: July 11th, 2023

help-circle
rss



  • Based on data presented here: https://ifstudies.org/blog/the-true-cost-of-raising-a-child

    It takes a minimum of $200K USD to raise a child from birth to 18; which works out to ~$1K/mo.

    If the Government were serious in wanting to address the aging population issue, the best way to tackle it would be to provide family funding at this level for a family’s first ~3 children.

    Would it be expensive? Absolutely it would be in the initial term - but the increase in economic activity would arguably more than cover it in the long run.

    Would it lead to inflation? Not if the costs were derived from taxes due to the government (which currently get dodged), rather than through national debt.

    Would it lead to a positive outcome for the nation? Arguably yes, but there may also be unintended consequences to the negative. Human greed knows no bounds, after all.











  • Given that most of the delay in building more/denser housing in California is due to NIMBYs fearing a drop in property values…

    …what’s to stop them from calling the cops on people living out of their cars on the street in front of their house?

    This entire proposal is beyond stupid, and is one of the underlying causes of the rise in right-wing populism all over the US.

    What the Government should do is use the threat of Eminent Domain and buy out a ~dozen houses in a certain block, tear them down and build ~100 affordable apartments for families (i.e. 3+ bedroom, 2+ bathrooms) in their place - and make them available to lower-and middle income families on a rent-to-own basis.

    If neighbouring plots complain, threaten them with Eminent Domain also, and continue on until the entirety of the unhoused population is accounted for.







  • Honestly not surprised, catering to GamersTM honestly feels like a fool’s errand; there seems to be an ever growing divide between what the vocal minority demands to see, and what the silent majority of the market ends up consuming.

    Catering to the former is like dancing on a knife’s edge, its only a matter of time before you fail to live up to their expectations - and that’s even if there’s enough of them to even be able to support a journalist’s career to begin with!

    Catering to the mainstream segment will usually cause you to fall on the former’s bad-side anyway, as they unleash a torrent of vitriol and hate at the journalists for not focusing on whatever manufactured outrage is de jour at the moment (previously woke, now DEI).