I think a little clarification is needed. No. I don’t actually think everyone there is insane. I don’t care about the bans so stop trying to use that. HB enthusiasts coming here and trying to call me out achieves nothing besides proving my point

Edit: Feel free to keep trying to brigade me. It’s not going to scare me to take this down

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    28 months ago

    If you’ve heard of Chapo Trap House that’s them. If not, most of those kids/idiots/trolls are the type of terminally online fake leftists that give other leftist a bad image in general. They were so ridiculous Reddit got tired of their shit and banned them a couple years back.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      18 months ago

      They were banned when reddit cracked down on any leftist thought, not because they were especially bad from what I saw.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        18 months ago

        They were banned around the same time as The Donald because everyone was tired of the shit both groups were doing.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          No, The Donald was encouraging political violence and was becoming a legal liability for Reddit to continue hosting. But they needed to ban a major left wing subreddit at the same time to do a “both sides bad” thing and preempt the fascist talking points about social media having a liberal bias.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          27 months ago

          They were banned while saying John Brown did nothing wrong and that slaveowners deserve to die.

          Sounds pretty cool to me.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -17 months ago

            While true there was a lot more behind the decision than that final post. They had been fighting with the admins for a long time.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              evidence? I see people say this but from what I remember the mod team was repeatedly stonewalled by the admins, or at least that was their claims, and I don’t think the admins ever disputed that

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                17 months ago

                Hardly, the mods kept refusing to do anything about the brigading of other subs. To the point the admins stepped in and removed a couple of them. Then afterward the sub decided they’d rather go private than comply. At this point most of back and forth is wiped out because the sub is locked. But there was far more going on for a while than their claim that one post shut them down immediately. They had already been in trouble for a couple months.

                https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditDrama/comments/bp39gb/chapotraphouse_gets_a_call_from_the_admins/

                https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fmfirtv1vndy21.png

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  I wasn’t clear enough, what I meant wasn’t that the admins literally never said anything to the mods, I meant they made it relatively unclear what exactly they needed to do to stop getting warnings and eventually getting banned. no conversation, just relatively vague commands from down high also, as you can see in the SRD thread it was never made clear if they were removed for anything besides the john brown posting. However, even this is more clear communication than I remembered so I’ll admit fault on that at least.

                  funny thing I found browsing the thread is this comment about why chapo got banned, which mentions brigading, something people constantly accused/accuse hexbear users of doing:

                  The second aspect of this is that chapo is becoming so large that it is capable of effectively “brigading” threads without any direct co-ordination on the subreddit. By this I’m referring to stuff like the police dog situation, in which any meaningfully upvoted thread on /r/aww and other “cute” subreddits gets a shitload of “40%”, “ACAB”, and other anti-cop rhetoric. While screenshots of this often get posted to /r/chapotraphouse, the vast majority of the time this is AFTER the thread has already been “brigaded” by chapo users scrolling through /r/all or the specific “cute” subreddits. This behavior is not against the TOS, but it is incredibly annoying to /r/aww mods and therefore concerning to the admins, because the “cute” subreddits are the easiest to manage and please, and more importantly, the most advertiser friendly. When chapo users fuck that up, there’s a problem.

                  sounds familiar doesn’t it?

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    07 months ago

                    Yes. They moved here. Have done the same things. Pissed many people off. Thankfully this time they can be easily contained due to how Lemmy works. They could just grow up and not be an embarrassment to the left. But that’s apparently too big an ask.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              There actually isn’t any such logic presented for the decision. Mostly just allusions to celebrating violence, the only examples of which were the anti-slavery posts I referenced.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          18 months ago

          The_Donald was dead amd had migrated to a non-reddit forum a month before the ban. It was typical “both sides” bullshit from a dude who always uses the kiddy gloves with fascists while throwing the book at any leftists

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          18 months ago

          I do remember that, and I remember them half-assing the Donald by just letting them make a new sub (or overrun conspiracy irrc)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            18 months ago

            Yeah they immediately took over Conspiracy and consolidated the hold on Conservative. Made me really sad as conspiracy used to have some incredible rabbit hole posts. Then one day it was just TD all over again.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            08 months ago

            Largely because they moved to different subs.

            The Chapo crew didn’t want to calm down with all the threats of violence and other ridiculous antics. So they left completely.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      0
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Seeing the ban coming, they financed and suffered alpha and beta of the Lemmy platform we all enjoy. Then, they chose to become the most GLBTQ+ friendly destination on the internet.

      As it’s always been, they cope with the horrible events with satirical, sarcastic humor. And, in the middle of that will be a well-reasoned, nuanced, and quite serious post.

      But, perhaps the part I like most is the struggle sessions. The entire community will heavily focus on a current topic, then hash it out with good faith discussion.

      Their shit isn’t convenient or comfortable. It’s not easy to understand. And, I fucking love them for it.

      edit: Lazy coders need choose a randomized target value and timing or be a moderator to avoid detection by the user. Perceiving is easy when your code is trash. Ask for help from an industrial engineer.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          -18 months ago

          There’s much to learn from Stalin. But, advocating his authoritarian means is a bannable offense there just as they are in any meritable leftist forum. They tolerate a minority of revolutionaries ideologically leading the lumpen as it’s a historically very well-supoorted position. But, that doesn’t extend to physical force as that’s also a historically very well supported position.

          It’s much easier, convenient, and comfortable to demonized them than understand them. They even provided proactive assistance when many were deciding if they should defederate. They voted internally for defederation to defend their community from the medicrity of the masses.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            If not enjoying the image posts of young Stalin as some sort of brilliant maverick is mediocrity, well, so be it. They are clowns, and their beliefs structure is just like trump claiming he “loves the gays”

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -18 months ago

              Young Stalin is where the good stuff is. It’s his implementation of those idealistic principles that’s unethical.

              The rest of what you’ve said is strawman. Most important is the implying that they’re all of one mind. Diversity of ideology is perhaps their greatest strength.

      • mathemachristian[he]
        link
        fedilink
        08 months ago

        Yeah they kept being able to back the most ridiculous claims and then suddenly I was like “oh no they were right all along” and got radicalized 🤷

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              08 months ago

              That’s the whole point of an echo chamber yes. You can say whatever you want without being challenged by other viewpoints and make anything seem plausible.

              • mathemachristian[he]
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                but they are linking a lot of outside sources. That’s what I mean by “backing their claims up”, studies about covid, about the ukraine war, about Israel, it’s not just someone making a claim and then everyone is nodding along.

                What I am saying is they were able to completely upend the way I see the world and you just can’t do that by claiming thengs and linking to some other claims you make.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              -18 months ago

              It’s surprisingly easy to backup horrible ideas, but that shouldn’t be your only concern. You also need to think about the morals and what happened last time it was tried.

              The ends do not justify the means. The means are the ends.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        0
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        As it’s always been, they cope with the horrible events with satirical, sarcastic humor. And, in the middle of that will be a well-reasoned, nuanced, and quite serious post.

        Oh yes, they are so funny, misunderstood, thoughtful and nuanced thinkers.

        F them and f you for defending them.

        This ~1800 comment thread about whether lemm.ee should defederate with them is all you need for some eye opening, in case anyone needs that.

        https://lemm.ee/post/4543536

        Above screenshot is from said thread.

        The comrade in it actually suggests that there is a time and place for such rhetoric, it is just not right here, right now. you have to think politically and wait for your moment!

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          Yes, please read what the .ee admin says about where the bigoted users originate and the actions of the hexbear mods in response. It certainly speaks for itself.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          The comrade in it actually suggests that there is a time and place for such rhetoric

          Perhaps now is the time.

          The kulaks were not an ethnic minority persecuted by the bolsheviks as a scapegoat for society’s ills. They were the economic class directly responsible for many of those ills. They were the capitalists of the peasantry, enclosing land and claiming ownership over what should have been the common means of production, precisely the kind of group that communists the world over want to destroy in order to liberate the majority of people.

          When it was written that the kulaks were to be “liquidated”, it did not mean that they were to be mass executed, it meant that their private property was to be moved into public ownership, ending the existence of the kulak class and making them into regular workers.

          As is the case in every single campaign of economic or social justice, the privileged class fought back with everything they had. Kulaks contributed to the Soviet Famine of 1930-1933 by mass slaughtering their cattle and burning their fields. Kulaks hoarded grain, took the wealth that they had stolen from their neighbors and fled the country, plotted sabotage and insurrection against the workers’ movement. And for those crimes, many Kulaks were caught and executed.

          So if the original commenter’s great grandparents were kulaks who “suffered at the hands of the soviet union,” they deserved it.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            0
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Perhaps now is the time.

            No, Time for condoning class war and murder is never and nowhere.

            Go back to hexbear, you poor, uneducated, lying, bolshevik piece of shit.

            But thank you for showing anyone who may have not had an experience with you before what type of people you are.

            One can always count on that, you morons just can’t help yourself.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              17 months ago

              If you don’t condone class war, then you are by necessity endorsing the current system. The current system which kills far, far more innocent people than any class war ever could, you lying, capitalist piece of shit.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            07 months ago

            Your portrayal of them just being made into regular peasants seems to me viewing the whole affair with more than rose colored glasses.

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dekulakization

            All kulaks were assigned to one of three categories:[4]
            Those to be shot or imprisoned as decided by the local secret political police. Those to be sent to Siberia, the North, the Urals, or Kazakhstan, after confiscation of their property. Those to be evicted from their houses and used in labour colonies within their own districts.

            By most people’s reckoning in most of planet earth they stole the lawfully earned property of kulaks and either murdered them or otherwise destroyed their lives. Treating them worse than most developed nations treat burglars and thieves.

            If someone shot your grandpa and your uncle, send half your people to Siberia to die out there, and sent the other half to prison locally of course you would flee with whatever you could carry and of course you would at that point be an enemy of the regime that destroyed your life.

            So if the original commenter’s great grandparents were kulaks who “suffered at the hands of the soviet union,” they deserved it.

            I don’t understand your justification for what is ultimately pretty horrific treatment foisted on people ultimately just participating lawfully in society up until that point.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              All kulaks were assigned to one of three categories:[4]

              Source four on this wikipedia article is Robert Conquest, an antihistorical Cold Warrior if there ever was one - and most of the rest of that article doesn’t even do the courtesy of citing a hack. It’s just section after section of “this section has no sources”, who wrote this garbage?

              If someone shot your grandpa and your uncle

              Some brave Vietnamese soldier did exactly that, and my uncle frankly deserved it for signing up to go murder people on the other side of the world in the name of American Imperialism.

              I don’t understand your justification for what is ultimately pretty horrific treatment foisted on people ultimately just participating lawfully in society up until that point.

              Slaveowners were “just participating lawfully in society” too. Society sanctions a lot of incredibly damaging and amoral behavior, and when the repressed take power there is no reason why they should be expected to give their oppressors a pass just because it was legal at the time.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                07 months ago

                America didn’t go from legally sanctioning a behavior to murdering the people today who were behaving lawfully yesterday even if they were immoral fucks. If you don’t understand that then you don’t understand how normal societies run.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  2
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  Tell me, how did Reconstruction go? Were the former slaves elevated to the status of citizens equal to their former masters?

                  No. The great post-Civil War failure of America was its failure to defend the gains made by the freed slave population, allowing the previous ruling class to swoop back in and reassert their power in a nearly-identical form to how it had been before. Sharecropping instead of slavery. This failure demonstrates quite succinctly why any social or economic justice movement cannot simply win the war - it must also continue to defend itself after the war, and that defense will by necessity take the form of repressing those members of the former ruling class who cannot accept the new status quo.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            -17 months ago

            🤭

            You guys don’t even hide it anymore. You’re openly advocating for brutal police regimes. The jokes write themselves. Convenient.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 months ago

              Equality has never in the history of our species been given freely by the ruling class to the workers. It has always been taken after violent struggle, and after the initial struggle is over the working class must be willing to defend their gains else they will lose them.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              You don’t get to call directing state power against the petite bourgeoisie a brutal police regime when your government is supporting the most brutal dictatorships in Africa, whose violence is directed at the working class.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                07 months ago

                Yeah I get to do that, because that’s what happened factually, sorry. No amount of whataboutism will change that. I don’t care about Western imperialists, fuck them too.

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  2
                  edit-2
                  7 months ago

                  The vital context is wielding state power against internal threats. Which literally every state must do to continue to exist. It’s not whataboutism to point out that the state you currently live in is currently doing far worse, for far worse reasons in a context where your criticism can only be used for anticommunism.

                  Would you say it’s constructive for an Israeli to be critical of gay rights in Palestine? Of course not, because divorced of context, it only carries water for imperialism

                  • @[email protected]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    07 months ago

                    The problem is the violence of the totalitarian regimes you defend harms innocents too, which is why serious communists shouldn’t advocate for that kind of power abuse any more than they should advocate for Western imperialism. It’s not that hard.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        -17 months ago

        As it’s always been, they cope with the horrible events with satirical, sarcastic humor. And, in the middle of that will be a well-reasoned, nuanced, and quite serious post.

        It’s just tankie 4chan

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          1
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Hello, low effort neolib troll. Thanks for the opportunity to continue to speak truth.

          There’s a cultural similarity to what 4-chan was prior to the LOIC. But, they’re definitely not tankies. Sincere expressions of authoritarian means are soundly defeated and usually result in permabans. The principle and practice is consistent for MAGA, neolibs, and other authoritarians.

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              17 months ago

              Definitely not a neolib

              Language analysis of your post history says differently. If you’re not a neolib troll then perhaps you should stop presenting as such.

              • @[email protected]
                link
                fedilink
                -1
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                I call BS. My post history has mostly been shitting on LLMs lately, mainly for the consequences they have on the environment, which I think is mostly a left-wing concern.

                Making shit up, how nice 🤭

                Edit you haven’t read much, I suppose because My 5th-ish last post was arguing against the liberal appeal to civility, which is definitely not a “neolib” talking point 🤷‍♀️

                • @[email protected]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  17 months ago

                  Did I fault your content or your presentation of it?

                  Nice strawman. You just can’t help yourself.