• metaStatic
    link
    fedilink
    308 months ago

    anything that was shot in 3D was fucking amazing, if you where underwhelmed it was because you watched some flat post production 2D conversion cash grab garbage, which I assume was the case for most people since no one makes 3D televisions anymore (yes, I know projectors are still being made with 3D capabilities)

    • AmidFuror
      link
      fedilink
      98 months ago

      I bought a 3D TV and liked watching movies on it. Agree that being shot in 3D is better, but anything released in 3D in theaters was good enough.

      I don’t know why they died. Too bad. Did streaming kill 3D perhaps?

      • metaStatic
        link
        fedilink
        318 months ago

        movies are inherently passive entertainment and the friction of needing glasses for everyone watching was probably enough to kill it for the average user. I think some people got headaches from the effect too and you couldn’t really have some people watching without glasses at the same time.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        158 months ago

        The glorified pop-up books killed 3D. That’s most of what people saw, so that was their perception of it.

        • metaStatic
          link
          fedilink
          38 months ago

          strangely never heard the phrase but it describes them perfectly

    • 🧟‍♂️ Cadaver
      link
      fedilink
      98 months ago

      I never was able to see in 3D because my eyes can’t bloody focus to produce stereoscopic images. 3D movies were hell for me and there was nothing amazing about the headaches it gave me.

      • HubertManne
        link
        fedilink
        48 months ago

        I was the opposite and it was detrimental working in a lab with stereo 3d. One of the main guys could not see 3d and he was great at perfecting the calibration because of it. I was awful at calibration because 3d shot into view so easily.