• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    510 days ago

    Is your imagination really this limited?

    Building a proper space station as a jumping off point for further exploration of the solar system, asteroid mining, He3 mining on the moon. These are just the basic things that are envisioned/planned. All of which would require commercial space travel to be a thing. I’d much rather we extract that funding from taking a couple rich people for a joyride as opposed to getting governments to subsidize it.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      410 days ago

      If it is a benefit for everyone I would prefer the government subsidized the development of space travel by taxing those rich fucks instead of relying on their ‘good will’ to selfishly experience everything themselves.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        110 days ago

        I view space development as very, very, very nice to have, but not absolutely essential. I would prefer to tax the shit out of the wealthy to pay for essential things at home (such as health care), and let private equity fund the nice to haves like commercial space travel. The exception would be for science missions. I’d prefer for the government to continue funding pure research, so that knowledge doesn’t get gated behind pay walls.

        • snooggums
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 days ago

          GPS, solar power, and a shitload of science all benefited massively from space missions that used government funding through taxes. That is the approach that I am in favor of, not space tourism for rich fucks.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            210 days ago

            Yeah, that’s why I said I’m in favour of maintaining government funding of science missions.