@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 10 days agoNot a dragqueenlemm.eeimagemessage-square177fedilinkarrow-up1417arrow-down18file-text
arrow-up1409arrow-down1imageNot a dragqueenlemm.ee@[email protected] to Microblog [email protected]English • 10 days agomessage-square177fedilinkfile-text
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 days agoIt was a parents unsecured weapon used in that shooting. So yes, they should be held responsible.
minus-squaremake -j8linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 days agoon the basis “serious negligence leading to death”, yes I agree with you. but not “because they re his parents”
minus-square@[email protected]linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 days agoOf course. But the point was that just because he is an adult, his parents are not excluded from being at fault. Their fault is the neglience, at least before the law. That it takes f-ed up parents to rise a f-ed up kid is another matter.
minus-squaremake -j8linkfedilinkEnglish1•8 days agoOh yeah i see now. Ha! who said two people can never agree on Internet, even when started with what seemed like opposite sides.
It was a parents unsecured weapon used in that shooting. So yes, they should be held responsible.
on the basis “serious negligence leading to death”, yes I agree with you. but not “because they re his parents”
Of course. But the point was that just because he is an adult, his parents are not excluded from being at fault. Their fault is the neglience, at least before the law.
That it takes f-ed up parents to rise a f-ed up kid is another matter.
Oh yeah i see now. Ha! who said two people can never agree on Internet, even when started with what seemed like opposite sides.