• melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    elon is now jealous because she folded for that AIPAC money, not his own payoff money. He could’ve bought a Cybertruck with that. /s

  • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Tbh she probably sealed the victory for el sayed, a lot of moderate dems were cold on him but stevens endorsement of rogers is so nakedly revolting that they’re all gonna line up to vote against rogers even if they don’t love the idea of El Sayed.

  • Pyr@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Honestly I don’t think the Democrats even want the Senate because they will have to come up with excuses as to why they can’t get anything done. Schumer won’t do fuck all especially if Bibi doesn’t approve. Need to get rid of Schumer if you want any actual change.

  • inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    Shocked? I can understand heartbroken but shocked? Really?

    Didn’t see that coming a million miles away like a lot of us more left leaning and progressives did?

    Maybe you guys should find a new profession then if you were shocked because you kind of suck at it.

  • Snowies@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    We need to replace all the liberal democrats in our government with left leaning/DSA.

    The people demand a party that will actually represent us, unapologetically, vehemently, with teeth, against corporations.

  • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 days ago

    If you’re ever in a leftist space and you hear: “Scratch a liberal and a fascist bleeds.”

    This is what we mean.

    • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      I get the saying, but if you piss off anybody you disagree with enough, they’re gonna hate you. I had a discussion with a friend about this very saying the other day. It also reeks of No True Scotsman.

      The problem with this idiom is that it essentially just says there’s no such thing as [liberals], and that everybody but [True Scotsmen] are [not fascists], which is just absolutely not true.

      It essentially leaves zero space for anybody to disagree with you, ever. Since as soon as they do, they should be treated as fascists, which is implied to be the absolute evil.

      • XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        No you just don’t know how politics works. Liberals and Fascists are ideologically alligned on most things. Liberals are just more into trying to whitewash their atrocities and use legalism as a shield. Fascism is just the final form of liberalism once all the fake smiles are gone. There’s PLENTY of ideologies that aren’t fascist. Liberalism and Fascism both fall into the category of corporatocracy. Rule via Corporations. and the wider category of capitalism. They are both right wing ideologies. Both anti-communist. etc. They have a LOT in common.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          Omg people using legalism as a shield is so dumb…

          Okay so, I do understand how the values differ. But I also know how being a dick to people makes them feel. It basically never wins them over. People put up their walls super fast as soon as they sense an agenda or hate. And yes, people can intuit hate in text over the internet.

          So like when you start off your response to my consideration of an idiom with “no you just don’t understand how politics works” you sound like a child. You’re also entirely missing my point. I KNOW that fascism and capitalism are neighbors. I know that VERY well. There’s literally no need to condescend at me over this. You’re wasting your energy trying to explain to me this stuff because you’re preaching to the choir.

          Your goal is to convince those people to rethink what they’re doing. And what YOU’RE doing is basically going “i am so smart and you’re a fascist” and then attacking them. That’s stupid as hell, and if anyone, you are the one that doesn’t understand how people work in systems where they believe they are free. Your strategy works when people are afraid of disagreeing with authority - which “liberals” are very much not. Liberals are afraid of disagreeing with money since they put it on a pedestal. So if you want to win those hearts, you have to speak their language and explain to them why that philosophy is bad.

          For example: “money isn’t everything, and morality is important” will get responded to with “but I have to pay the bills” which you could respond with “what about all the harm you’re doing by your inaction which results in the companies and rich growing in power by YOUR SUBMISSION and executing atrocities?” Which then gets the real conversation started.

          Saying you are a fascist and telling people how close capitalists are to Nazis is a waste of time and everybody’s walls going up and nothing changing, it’s a literal losing strategy, no matter if it’s true or not.

            • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              5 days ago

              … What? No? Not even remotely. Though your super hostile questioning of that is, in itself pretty worrying. I mean no offense and am literally trying to break bread with you. Though if you continue… whatever this is, this conversation may end.

              What a bizarre turn of attitude… maybe you think I’m acting out at you? If I’ve said something to offend you, I apologize, it wasn’t my intent. Though, maybe it wasn’t a turn of attitude at all?

              But yeah, literally …Um, what? Maybe you’re trying to troll somebody else? Freudian mask slip? My feelings are not hurt, my day is not ruined, who are you, again?

              • XiJinpingStanAccount@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                5 days ago

                You’re complaining about my tone and projecting your goals on to me. I am not trying to “convert” liberals. It’s annoying when you seem to think you know what I’m trying to do and tell me how I’m doing it wrong. When in reality we have entirely different goals. And we don’t agree on this stuff. Capitalism and fascism are not “neighbors” they’re the same fucking thing. That’s the entire point I was making earlier.

                Your goal is to convince those people to rethink what they’re doing.

                Not it isn’t. When I make a comment under someone I think is wrong I am not trying to change their mind. I am simply stating for anyone else who might also disagree with them that they are not alone in that. I have no interest in recruiting and allying with liberals. That’s just silly. Might as well try explaining to a Nazi why they shouldn’t be a Nazi.

                I am literally telling liberals that I think they’re disgusting Nazi apologists. Why would I want to convert those people to my side?

                So, I’ll admit maybe I was too dissmissive to you, and that I just sent that as a digital middle finger after reading you complaining about my tone without bothering to read the rest of what you said. I don’t agree with you though, and we don’t share the same goals or views. I’m not going to spend 2 hours laying out all the things I think but I can tell we’re quite different in how we see things. Like I said tho I’m not interested in changing your mind. So you keep on trying to make liberals see the light. As unfun as that sounds…

      • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        I can concede the sentiment sure. I’m sure there are well meaning liberals but there is a certain point when pressed where they either move left to resist growing fascism, or they become Haley Stevens. Fence sitting only gets people so far.

        • SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          For most people, they’re along for the ride, and out of fear or whatever reason, cannot act. Challenging them by equating them to fascists is such a risky strategy. It OFTEN goes the wrong way. I do not have a good solution, but I do know and am concerned over the risks.

          • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            Sure and to the average voter that statement doesn’t really apply the ‘average voter’ also isn’t going to find themselves on Lemmy. I imagine to be frank the “average voter” thinks libs and the left are the same thing. To liberal POLITICIANS - It absolutely does. As for why I bring it up here, Lemmy, yes even .world has a left bent, people will be exposed to the saying on Lemmy it’s important to call it out when it happens.

    • keb@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      That doesn’t make any sense though, because the vast majority of politicians condemning her are liberals.

        • keb@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t see how this URL is a response, but the site implies a conspiracy while also listing Democrats who “Rarely Rotate”, which seems to betray the whole premise of the conspiracy theory. Isn’t it a more likely explanation that some Democrats simply lean more conservative or vote based on their constituents? I mean, Marie Perez is literally a co-chair of the Blue Dog Coalition and competes in a district that went red in 2024.

          • Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            5 days ago

            It’s because “liberals speaking out against her” doesn’t mean anything when she is doing this for Israel. She is criticized by Chuck Schumer, who has stated that he is in his position to “support Israel”.

            And a historical account of neoliberal voting records is not a “conspiracy theory”

            WWE wrestling was the simplest pageantry that had “heroes” and “heels” and the rubes in the audience think it is all real. These terms are even used when people are on corporate media. People are assigned to be the conservative/liberal “heel”.

            There is nothing new about rotating villains, and controlled opposition. Maybe learn something before you start running your ignorant mouth when answers are provided to you.

          • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            The point is theres always just enough who vote with the obvious fascists so the agenda passes. Or just enough who go against the blue team so their agenda fails. Almost like it’s planned opposition. “Look guys, we tried to stop them, oopsies we’re so helpless! How could we know that exactly 3 people in our bloc from the safest blue districts would go against us?”

            It’s seemingly every damn time there is a major policy fight. What immediately comes to mind is the last shutdown. Performative at best. The Dems had public support, but then people in safe districts just gave in.

            Yet when a progressive runs or has support then the party finds their spine to undermine them.

      • EchoCT@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Not sure how that disproves my point other than that she’s a Lib bought and paid for like Schumer, who then got scratched and went mask off.

  • UltraMagnus0001@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    She does Democrat stuff in most of her policies, but she also has large donations from aipac, is converting to Judaism through marriage and she also lost to Abdul in 2019, I think. They never liked each other and she’s petty for letting that get in the way of working for the people like Abdul says he will.

    • PNW clouds@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes. Tricia Cotham in NC. She got elected to state level seat as a Democrat and switched parties. And voted opposite what she promised. Then NC GOP gerrymandered again.

      • marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 days ago

        Yes. The original meaning of left wing and right wing were the radical and conservative wings of the French parliament; the former being for liberalism, the later for monarchism. It has since kept its same meaning, progression or regression.

        The DNC’s official party stances are objectively regression. Progression, at this stage of socioeconomic development for the US, would be socialism. Actually it’d just be social capitalism since we have the worst social safety net of all advanced economies in world history, but given the party’s opposition to medicare for all, it cannot even manage that.

        The left wing starts at anti-capitalism in all places with established capitalist markets.

    • Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      No. AIPAC mostly funds Democrats, who are neoliberal. So we only have two right wing parties. There isn’t anyone to “activate”. Corporate Dems believe in business interests as a priority and that is how they behave.

    • mushroommunk@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      It’s not Republicans, it’s Israel and it’s both parties. Israel is worried because the progressive candidates have a real chance this election and are performing on not spending billions on Israel as well as health and wealth reform.

    • Etterra@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 days ago

      Yes, but also there’s plenty of Democrat bigots. A lot of them are “centrist” and/or “moderate.”

    • rafoix@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      Seems like a lot of people in power or seeking power are there to make sure Israel continues to get American taxpayer money, endless weapons, legal immunity and the willingness to go to send American troops to die for Israel.

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      6 days ago

      I don’t. I hope she lives a long, healthy, miserable life with the shame of her craven greed and wanton pettiness.

      Actually, I hope that shame moves her to make amends. But I’ve been around too long to really think that’s likely.