• mastertigurius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      …or a counteroffensive? Or is your opinion that if the school yard bully starts punching you, the right thing to do is to lie down and let him punch you some more?

      • tomi000@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you punch him harder than he did in the beginning (or he cries louder), suddenly you are the bully.

        • mastertigurius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ahem…“punching harder” than bombing kindergartens, residential blocks, power plants and hospitals? Chasing street grocers with explosive drones and kidnapping scores of children across the border? There’s only one side that’s on the right side of history here, and that’s pretty damn clear.

          • Mr.Chewy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            “Guysh, there’s no 1 correkt shide, resholving confliktsh ish about finding the middle point sholution ash a compromishe so both shides can be friendsh again!!”

  • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 days ago

    If the broader population is so retarded that their vote can be controlled by clankers on reddit to this extent, then democracy is a fundamentally flawed system.

    • Equinox1289@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Those bots were just crawlers for yandex search. If you actually look up the report they weren’t accessing or posting user content, just looking thru web pages.

      • BCsven@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I’m surprised Lemmy gave so many down votes, maybe its reaching reddit type users

    • rowansprig@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      People are flawed. Education quality is also a systemic problem which has caused many to not reach the potential they might’ve had. But I don’t think using the R-slur will help?

      • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Do you complain about the two I-Slurs, the M-slurs, as well?

        I’m just going to say. Retarded has the most right to exist out of all the words that have been malformed from medical diagnoses that mean “has diminished capacity”.

        It has an actual function outside of being used as an insult, unlike Moron, Imbecile, and Idiot. And should not be censored or have people in favor of its censorship as we’ve already seen the nanny state corporations are happy to implement.

        If you’re wondering why I say this it’s because of words like “Fire Retardent” Or saying something slows things down is to retard it(older usage I know, but it does pop up from time to time in technical documents for things). There are more uses, but admittedly I’m tired today and don’t have it in me to dredge up more examples.

        And yeah sorry that you personally are getting the brunt of this rant, but I’m so tired of censorship on words in general, but especially on words that have uses outside of the insult. I also hate how inconsistent people are with it.

        It’s a fucking word. It’s a fucking word that means the same as stupid, idiot, moron, imbecile, it just hits harder for most. It’s not a real slur, imo. And if you’re using it as a slur, that’s on you and you’re a fucking moron for it.

        • ElChinchilla@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          Our engines had engine retarders on them. My mechanic, Mike, said he was a retarded retarder. Self burns are the best. As a slur towards others, no bueno.

        • BCsven@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          It no longer means the same though. Language changes, and the R word is used as an insult equating somebody to somebody with down syndrome (as an example) while Moron and Idiot don’t have a direct correlation to a group.

          While all are still uses medically, there is context needed. Like the test might say your child is in the idiot, moron range. But a doctor will now say they have mental retardation or reduced mental capacity. They dont say hey parents your kid is ‘Re----"

          People still using the R word (as non time related uses) are just behind the times, like when my mom called black people colored…at some point somebody has to confront you and say “hey, this is not how we do things now”

          • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Moron and Idiot were the original correlations. People adopted those words as insults and the medical community adopted new words, and then those words got used as insults, and then the medical community adopted new words…

            And on and on and on. Moron equates you to someone with diminished capacity like someone with down syndrome, to use your example. So does Idiot, and Imbecile. As again they were medical terms turned into insults lol.

            So like by all means hate Retarded as a word, but have some consistency.

            • BCsven@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              2 days ago

              The terms moron and idiot are still used on the test reports, but nobody nowawdays associates calling somebody an idiot/moron with a slur against the mentally challenged, but the R word is.

              Like under your argument we can still call people gay as a slur because it used to mean happy.

              We stopped calling people gay or R word in the early 90s dude.

              • retard is falling out of fashion, but it is being replaced with “intellectually challenged” and similar phrases because people will never not want a word to describe those that aren’t smart enough to fit in.

              • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 day ago

                We stopped calling people gay or R word in the early 90s dude.

                Wtf? Were you not around then? No we absolutely didn’t.

                It wasn’t until the early oughts that it started to fall out of fashion and it wasn’t until the teens that it was considered slur territory.

                • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  We did where I lived. Was around the George Michael and other stars coming out, and people waking up about slurs, N word also was dropping out.

              • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 days ago

                Lmao, sorry, sorry. I just wasn’t expecting to get told, wrongly, about history I lived through. Retard didn’t fall out of favor until the 2010’s, and gay as an insult only started wearing off towards the late 00’s early 10’s which is why you can still see it in media from the time.

                Not sure how old you are, but I found it very funny.

                • BCsven@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Highschool mid 80s. Maybe I just lived in a more progressive zone, where language changed faster, or people realised it was not couth

        • rowansprig@leminal.space
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Not sure what your context and life story is. From my perspective it seemed like an aggressive and vitriolic choice where “stupid” would have sufficed. As an insult it seems to have a lot more cultural weight behind it which is why I called it a slur. Words are all just sounds, it’s the societal landscape which decides what they actually mean. My friends were telling me they’ve been hearing that word used a lot more frequently as an insult than they remembered from a couple of years ago, so I was particularly primed to make a comment on it.

          I am not in favour of censorship of people’s words at the state level. Language is a community project which should be dealt with at a community level. Which is why I said something. I think we should try to be a bit kind in how we speak.

          Now that I think about it I don’t think calling people stupid is helpful either. I feel like a lot of “stupidity”, especially as relates to politics, is about low quality schooling and a social media landscape which is designed to implant and further certain beliefs.

          Yeah anyway, I guess, mostly I’m tired of watching the world crumble around me and would like to start building things so this mostly ended up as a pile of my random thoughts. I hope you’re having a less tiring day today 😊

          • ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            I do understand the perspective, I just feel like going after “Retarded” as a slur is dumb on multiple levels. One, it diminishes actual slurs and what they represent. Two(which I’ve already covered) has actual uses outside of just being an insult. Three the devolution of our language due to censorship is an issue as a whole and this bothers me(Grape, PDFile come to mind as well). Four, its inconsistent with the other words of the same tier and meaning. And Fifth, it only became designated as a “slur” relatively recently which wraps back around to point one.

            And last but not a viable point, there just isn’t a word that is as succinct as “retarded” for something so incredulously dumb that it defies belief, in my opinion.

            With that all said, I hope you understand I wasn’t coming after you personally, you just triggered something that’s been bothering me. Again, sorry you got the brunt of that rant. Even that last part wasn’t for you. Please have a lovely day.

    • _stranger_@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It all comes down to the fact that the human psyche evolved from selfish monkeys, the kind that killed all the other types of monkeys that were slightly different from them. It’s almost like humanity has been trying to solve this problem since the dawn of time.

      • NonconfrontationaI@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        No, we evolved to be hyper social apes which rely on cooperation in order to survive. God you people are so confidently ignorant, lol.

      • Taleya@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Dude. Modern humans aee made up of like six different species. We don’t kill The Other. We fuck 'em like crazy

      • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Except this absolutely isn’t even close to true. We interbred with other species prolifically to the point every person on Earth has Neanderthal DNA and Denisovian DNA, among other genetic material we don’t know the specific origins.

        That kind of misanthropic view that homo spaiens just “killed all the other types of monkeys” is toxic.

          • Crankenstein@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            Yes, because of other evolutionary pressures. That doesn’t mean humans wiped them out, only that our species’ lineage survived when theirs didn’t.

      • baltakatei@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Democracy is inefficient at central control and efficient at making sure no single faction stays in power for long. Dynastic autocracy had its chance for several thousand years and never advanced very far past people shitting themselves to death, what with ruling noble bloodlines hamstringing themselves with nepotism and inbreeding. At least with democracy people fixing things and producing food can defend their harvests and reïnvest their profits into free time to improve their tooling instead of getting sent off to kill one another wars no one wants except for idiot lords.

      • 1984@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Well the big plan is to replace it with Ai and world government later, so… Won’t be an issue. Who needs democracy when you have AI making the “best” decisions. :)

        • MangioneDontMiss@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Its a good thing that massive corporations are being allowed to teach their AI in an almost completely unregulated manner then.

    • Jiral@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      It is, but the other systems are at least as flawed and much worse when things go really bad.

    • MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Any system ruled by humans is a flawed system. Which is why democracy must be ruled bottom-up and not top-down. And have more than one representative, on any level. And last but not least, good general education (which is why fascist always start there).

      • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        I called this years ago (ruled by humans being flawed, not bottom-up democracy which IMO is a half-measure). AI is the only solution that can be better long-term than democracy. I do not, however, mean we should let Claude run society. We’d need actual AGI that doesn’t just get trained, but learns properly on its own without cheap tricks like writing memory files. It also shouldn’t be influenced by any individuals or organizations.

        It’s really a pipe dream at this stage.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          Right and wrong are just words. What matters is what you do.

          (I just watched that episode of Futurama where Bender was God and it’s a perfectly fitting analogy here, I think).

          Firstly, your proposal requires a perfect and noble system. There’s two major problems right there…one in developing a perfect system, and the other in defining what “noble” actually means.

          What’s good for one may be bad for another. In often cases it is, especially under a capitalist system where we are made to compete directly with each other.

          An example…my box of Kellog’s Raisin Bran says, on the back, “Cereal makes eating well easy”. I misread it at first and thought it said “cereal makers eating well”, and pondered about that for a moment.

          As a consumer, we don’t want cereal makers eating well. I mean, we say we do, but our actions prove otherwise. Consumers are disincentivised from the cereal makers (as in the grain farmers) eating well, because that means a more expensive product, which is money out of their pockets, which now means they are eating less well than they would have. We are subconsciously at war with our peers.

        • 1984@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          This is the elite wet dream, yes. Replace all pesky humans with machines, because “democracy doesn’t work”… Except it does work, if you have a unbiased media and an educated population.

          Humans ruled by some AI that will never be influenced by humans will never happen. What if the Ai suggests things that are bad for the rulers of society? There will always be corrupt humans directing our systems, to stay rich and powerful.

          Which means we need less technology, less machines, less surveillance, to have a society where humans can feel free and happy. Unlimited technology leads to dystopia for humans.

          • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 days ago

            This is the elite wet dream, yes. Replace all pesky humans with machines

            I’m proposing that the elite be replaced with machines. I’m not saying it’s easy, nor necessarily even possible, certainly not at the current level of technological and societal development.

            Except it does work, if you have a unbiased media

            There’s no such thing as truly unbiased media, it’s nearly impossible. Or are you proposing banning all media that isn’t state media? Private media will always have an agenda. Often so will state media though, and that can easily become even more dangerous.

            and an educated population.

            Doesn’t work. Or are you going to force everyone into poli sci majors? Majority of Europe has free higher education and in most countries the far right has been on the rise again. Even plenty of educated people vote for those parties. Hell, I can tell you that many of the people IN those parties, at least in my country, have degrees one might consider relevant to good governance (history, law, etc) and yet they spew hate.

            What if the Ai suggests things that are bad for the rulers of society?

            The idea is that the AI has to be the ruler of society and nobody else can have power over it. It also involves developing perfect AI first. I did say it was a pipe dream, didn’t I?

            There will always be corrupt humans directing our systems, to stay rich and powerful.

            It goes without saying that the existence of private property is part of that plan. The AI would decide who needs how much resources. The book you’ve named yourself after is kind of relevant, but the inner party still consisted of humans and they had ulterior motives. As O’brian himself said, the party’s ultimate goal was nothing other than just the control itself. The AI would have to have an ultimate goal of maximum human happiness, freedom and longevity, as much as possible without giving people freedom to have power over others.

            Which means we need less technology, less machines, less surveillance, to have a society where humans can feel free and happy.

            Doesn’t work either, unless society is fewer than 100 people or so. Above that we start developing these nasty things called hierarchies. Rulers and such. No human rulers can be allowed to exist if we want a truly just society. Impartial, completely neutral humans don’t exist. Democracy doesn’t work because voters can be swayed and BDFLs are just that, FL. They die and the next one might not be very B, but will be just as D if not moreso.

    • SpookyBogMonster@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I mean, I get the joke, but the dems won very explicitly because voters were reacting to poor economic conditions brought on by the Iran War

      • DonJefe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        You forget about ICE, my friend. That was one of the main reasons Texas went blue. The Rio Grande valley flipped from red to blue just because that

    • ramble81@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      I saw some huffing some serious copium saying “those DCs didn’t have any bots! They were just indexers for a search engine!”… right, like you knew and trusted what was running on every single server in those DCs.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Eh. I actually think there didn’t seem to be many bots at those locations. But they have bots somewhere, and the joke is funny anyway.

        • drath@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 days ago

          TBF they did have Alisa AI training and inference machines in those data centers, but I doubt they saw any significant use in propaganda campains.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Same for .world tbh, though not as bad.

      My other account that I created when Sopuli was down and that has stayed logged in on another device I use, was banned from pretty much all .world communities for criticizing zionists and pretty much all .ml communities for criticizing the CCP lol

      • TransNeko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 days ago

        Remember, every religion has a zionist faction. they fight each other but when threatened by outsiders they all work together. The Zionist Jews in WW2 actively aided the Nazis in order to push the surviving Jews to their side, while the Nazis agreed because it made it easier to remove Jews from their vile Aryan empire.

        In ancient history, the Crusades were just Zionist Christians (with Zionist Jews as allies) against Zionist Muslims. Which was stupid because they were all of the same faith… just different factions. Christians are just Jews that accept “Jesus” as a prophet and divine entity (aka a second god while gaslighting the world and themselves into saying they only worship one god). Jews stick to worshipping one god. Muslims are basically just Christians that accept 2 prophets (Jesus and Mohammed) while saying that neither are divine. which pisses off Christians who worship their not-god-god Jesus while also pissing off the Jews who refuse to recognize either of the prophets.

        In Modern days: Christianity has a bunch of Zionist factions. – They fund MAGA and rose to power twice in the last 100 years. Once in Nazi Germany through Hitler (despite him being of Jewish descent) and the other in the USA during Trump’s presidency with his avid support.

        Muslims have their well known terrorist groups. – which were all funded by or founded by the CIA to fight Russia. that really bit USA in the ass when the Muslim groups realized that the CIA (and the USA) were never going to honor their promises. que 9/11.

        Jews have the Israeli Genocide Force. which they claim defends them from Palestine. Before and during WW2 the Palestinians welcomed the Jews (who were fleeing persecution) with open arms. then were rewarded with Jews being given Palestinian land and an 80 year long genocide by the very people they helped protect from Nazi enforced genocide. talk about the “scorpion stinging the frog” story in real life. Jews of Israel being the Scorpion in the story and Palestinians being the Frog in the Story.

        Buddhists and Hindus have their own conflicts but they tend to just fight each other away from the western world with only a few stories making their way onto USA news. and most of those are when they get into conflicts with Muslim Zionists.

        • cmbabul@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 day ago

          The history of humanity is really just the story of unlikely progress in the face of a vast series of fascistic cults

    • BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      .ml is an echo chamber cultivated by handful of mods who control all the popupar subs. Its just like reddit

  • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    When I despair about how Ukraine can ever rebuild after this war, my mind keeps circling back to their expertise at blowing up data centres. This could prove a highly marketable skill!

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s funny and all, but no credible source reported lowered Russian bot activity after those bombings. It’s one of those things that makes sense, but didn’t happen.

  • lobut@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Just goes to show you that when an administration screws up this big that the other side can win at like 53 to like 44 in certain places.