• VAK@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    42 minutes ago

    That’s what circular financing is, has no one been paying attention?

  • Tower@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Shovel maker props up mining corporations to ensure he can keep selling more shovels.

  • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Wait, wasn’t this obvious for couple of years already? We knew about the circlejerk between Nvidia and AI companies for quite some time now. What’s the news here?

  • borth@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    While Jensen can’t be faulted for making these moves because he was keeping the best interests of the company in mind

    Who the fuck came up with this bullshit? OF COURSE we can fault them. That’s the same kind of logic as saying that we can’t fault the Nazis because they were “just doing their job”.

  • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    From the article:

    While Jensen can’t be faulted for making these moves because he was keeping the best interests of the company in mind,….

    I’m pretty sure he can be faulted for manipulating the market. 😂 I’m sure there is a law somewhere that says this is illegal. Maybe start looking at anti-trust laws.

    Unfortunately, the US hasn’t had a functioning government in over a decade.

  • Nelots@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    While Jensen can’t be faulted for making these moves because he was keeping the best interests of the company in mind, it’s a stab in the back for gamers and hardware owners who are unable to locate any mouth-watering deals for GPUs or memory because of the perceived shortage.

    I really dislike this final paragraph. In one sentence, it both attempts to absolve Jensen of all fault in the current shortage, and frames gamers and hardware enthusiasts as entitled babies crying about the lack of amazing sales. Rather than the reality of high-end GPUs requiring you to take out a loan at this point, if you can even find one. I don’t need a “mouth-watering deal”, I’ll settle for affordable, thanks.

    • chisel@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It has a point in that Jensen was not alone in these decisions and the real blame should be placed on Nvidia as a whole. The headline pins the blame solely on Jensen, using him as a scapegoat while the actual company dodges blame and continues its anti-consumer practices.

    • BananaTrifleViolin@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Crazy final paragraph. The whole article is about Nvidia has artificially created scarcity for its products by funding AI start ups to buy it’s products.

      It is effectively buying back its own products. This alongside the circular payment systems between AI companies and Nvidia is destined to end very very badly. It can only work while the market grows and share prices go up. It is destined to be one catastrophic collapse when things go the other way.

      • RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Interesting best interests. I guess Nvidia investors could all have a deep seeded masochistic and self-destruction fetish, but it sounds unlikely.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        This is only possible because the stock market is a fucking Ponzi scheme

    • absquatulate@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I mean bootlicking aside, they’re not wrong. Jensen’s a corpo and they will always chase profits. Sometimes stooping to borderline illegal maneuvers like this price fixing thing or the ram cartel. In an ideal world these fuckers would get prosecuted and do jail time, but as it stands we are somewhat at their whims. That’s why I don’t get this entitlement with affordable gpu’s - they’re high tech components and for a while they were more affordable but gamers are no longer the most profitable market so yhings change. There was no “betrayal” and no “abandonment” because no one owes gamers anything, just like they don’t owe the companies anything. Shit’s bkt affordable? Short of a class action lawsuit, tough luck, adapt and move on, because it looks like we’re heading back to the gpu wild west of the late 90s.

    • halfapage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 hours ago

      TIL no matter what you do it’s always justified as long as you’ve had your company’s interest on your mind

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 hours ago

        no matter what you do it’s always justified as long as you’ve had your company’s interest on your mind

        That is exactly what the tobacco and oil companies have been arguing for decades.

        Killing your customers or the planet are much less important things than constantly increasing corporate revenue.

    • Kichae@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Few groups have been bigger apologists for their corporate abusers than capital-G Gamers. They would have followed Nvidia into hell itself so long as Huang blew even the thinnest wisps of smoke up their unwashed asses. Discovering that their hardware suppliers have only ever used them for their money has seriously hurt their egos and broken their brains.

      It’s like Gamers thought they were dating the most popular kid in school, only to discover that they were only hanging out with Gamers because Gamers’ mom had an old Mustang that she like them drive. Now they’re dating someone rich college student who owns a Porche, and they’re not returning Gamers’ calls, and they’re going through all of the phase of teenage grief.

      • Damage@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        And don’t forget tech “reviewers” like Linus who badmouth Nvidia and then only show their fucking GPUs in every video that isn’t an AMD benchmark

      • shalafi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        NAILED. IT. I’d love all the people who feel they have a right to video cards explain that to a Palestinian orphan.

          • shalafi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            4 hours ago

            An orphan, is by definition, alive. No one talks about “dead orphans”. Bruce Wayne isn’t a “live orphan”.

            Anyway, my comment was about the privilege Western gamers have in 2026.

            “NOAAWW! You can’t take away my high-end video cards! I have the RIGHT to play video games at a reasonable price!”

            Imagine explaining your vast suffering under these filthy capitalists from your watertight, HVAC controlled domicile. Said suffering is way overblown on lemmy.

            • kopasz7@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I hope you think of people with no legs when you stub your toe in the dark.

              (Invalidating anyone’s suffering on the basis that someone else out there has it worse would mean that nobody else is justified to suffer than the absolutely most miserable. Suffering is an inescapable facet of the human condition, but it doesn’t mean we shoudn’t try reducing it.)

  • neidu4@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I bought 32GB not long ago and now I want 32GB more*. These buckets represent everything wrong with the industry.

    *: Partially as a proverbial middle finger to piss off Sam LLMtman

    • morto@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I understand the sentiment, but buying more ram right now means rewarding the market for its scheme and accepting the inflated prices. it’s the very opposite of giving a middle finger

      • neidu4@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I’m not buying now. I’ll manage with 32G plus swap until these guys are forced to sell unused stock (long story short, loads of the hardware bought by the tech bros aren’t even in use yet. They’re bought now so that finance departments can for once write up an asset as appreciating in value)

        I’m not holding my breath, because I think it’ll take a lot longer than most Lemmings think for the bubble to pop. But I am sure it will pop eventually, and I am thoroughly looking forward to it.