- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
- cross-posted to:
- [email protected]
A song I wrote about my parents.
I am not a professional musician, I am a broken human being.
A song I wrote about my parents.
I am not a professional musician, I am a broken human being.
It’s not special pleading if it’s actually special.
Do you actually think an omnipotent creator would be bound by the same constraints as us?
Prove that it’s actually special.
You can’t.
You’re making a deadly assertion with zero evidence.
He created us, right? He is thus of a different nature than us as our nature had not existed before he created it
Wrong. Why do you keep pretending this is a fact?
Weird use of “nature”. So who or what created god?
Maybe the universe is of a different “nature” to us and always existed. We don’t know, so stop pretending.
God cannot be created or else he wouldn’t be God.
Read Aquinas
Did you know that saying something doesn’t make it true? I have read Aquinas. He’s full of shit and so are you. You have no argument supporting god’s existence.
Did you research the Principle for Sufficient Reason?
Everything that exists has a sufficient reason to exist
Tell me, what is your reason?
Including god, then? So Jod is real?
You cannot define god into existence. Provide evidence for his existence. You can’t.
there is a lot of philosophical proof for God’s existence
Philosophy is “some guy said ___.” I am asking for actual evidence.
Jod is even specialer.
You’re right, jod is above all. Praise jod.
Well, again, God can’t be created as then he wouldn’t be God
Same with jod. Also, jod created god.
Since we’re all just making shit up here. You haven’t proven anything you are saying. My baseless claims are just as valid as yours.
You better not disrespect jod. You don’t want to go to turbohell, do you?
This would require God to be created, which is a logical contradiction
No, it’s not logical to believe that god exists at all.
Why?
Wrong question. You are the one making the positive claim that god exists.
Why should anyone believe that?
one of the.multiple reasons is the principle of sufficient reason