The band Muse has surrendered its Instagram and X handles to Meta after the release of its new AI agent, Muse.

The English rock band Muse has been renamed on Instagram and X from “Muse” to “museband.”

Despite the band Muse having had its Instagram account since 2012 and its X account since 2008, it has seemingly surrendered the handle to Mark Zuckerberg’s newest AI agent.

  • Sanctus@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    Not to defend rich people, but the dude who had X since the beginning of time just had it taken from him. I assume the same thing happened here. They just woke up and were suddenly muse band. Mostly because I dont see Meta or any tech company ever asking for shit nowadays. Just smash and grab.

  • Kiernian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    “Surrendered” is only applicable if the band had a choice.

    Remember folks, calling out shitty wording is necessary to defeat propoganda.

    • Sarah Valentine@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      They had a choice. They chose to advertise themselves on the “Grandma’s Racist Rants And Old White Guys With Sunglasses Who Hate Poor People” platform. Color me shocked that it’s turning out to have been a bad choice.

      • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        They chose to advertise themselves on the “Grandma’s Racist Rants And Old White Guys With Sunglasses Who Hate Poor People” platform.

        While true, they also advertised themselves on a platform most Americans use.

        Say what you want about someone’s ability to not use a social media platform in the first place, but if you’re a band that depends on… people, it’s hard to just decide not to put yourself out there on a platform where so many people are.

        The network effect is real. It’s where people’s friends, family, celebrities, bands, etc all are. Leaving means leaving people who are important to you.

        A lot of people find it easier to leave platforms like Twitter now, because the platform is such a shell of its former self that it doesn’t even provide what many people originally came there for, but if you’re on Instagram, Facebook, etc, it still often provides people with easy communication to/from family and friends, and organizations like bands with access to an audience, promotion, visibility, etc.

        Leaving the platform means leaving fans, and giving up visibility. I wish everyone could just quit Meta’s platforms and crush the company, but there’s a very simple collective action problem at play here that makes it very difficult, don’t discount that.

        • jtrek@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 days ago

          I think it applies differently to famous, rich, figures who already have an audience. They could loudly announce they’re leaving facebook. A chunk of their fans would follow. They’re already rich, they can tank losing some fans. It would be better for everyone to get people off Facebook platforms and onto open ones.

          Some local band that’s struggling to get their first EP out I could maybe cut some slack on going to where the people are.

          • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            That’s fair. Still, I do think it’s a tad unreasonable to expect of people, when it can significantly impact their popularity and thus their income, when the actual effect of them leaving is usually that… essentially nothing happens to the company they’re leaving from.

            Unfortunately, Facebook and its users likely won’t care much if someone leaves the platform, as long as they can keep scrolling. It’s gotta be on a very large scale, with a lot of people giving up portions of their audience before more people start genuinely moving to alternatives.

            • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              19 days ago

              significantly impact their popularity and thus their income,

              The person referenced successful bands that don’t need more money. That’s really no different than saying, “You can’t expect billionaires to stop being evil when it would significantly impact their income.”

              essentially nothing happens to the company they’re leaving from.

              The network effect works both ways. See Myspace and Friendster.

          • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            20 days ago

            I’d hardly call explaining the network effect and collective action problem fascist apologia, but you do you.

            All I’m saying is you can’t expect someone to leave behind most of their audience’s primary way of communicating with them scot-free. There are always consequences.

            Let’s say they stop posting on Instagram. Out of those 2.7 million followers, only a fraction will find them on another platform, and thus they simply lose their ability to message to all the people they left behind. That hurts them.

            You can still think it’s a net good for society for them to leave, or that it would meaningfully hurt Facebook (it wouldn’t unless most people also left, but again, collective action problem), but you can’t act like they don’t face consequences by doing it. It’s not “fascist bootlicker apologia” to say that leaving some of your audience behind on a platform reduces your audience.

      • xtr0n@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        20 days ago

        I absolutely hate that so many people still use these shit platforms run my the worst people on the planet. That said, if you are famous, there is a dilemma where, if you refuse to use these platforms, someone will make a fake account that purports to be you.

        • verifiedbyme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 days ago

          At the same time, these people would have the pull to really promote the alternatives. Imagine if a channel with tens of millions of followers announces they are leaving for the Fediverse. Thing is, they are most likely getting a metric fuck-ton of money on Instagram and the like, so I’m not counting on that to happen anytime soon.

  • Rothe@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    It is so odd that everybody seems to dump on facebook (and rightly so), but everybody is still using instagram, perhaps even more than ever.

  • SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    This is hilarious.

    I bet Muse got paid. If I were in the band I’d say absolutely sell the thing- the Muse AI thing is going to crash and burn anyway so might as well get paid especially if they’re too dumb to realize MuseAI would be a better handle anyway.

    • gmtom@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      19 days ago

      Sure if hundreds of millions stop using it. But convincing the uncritical masses to stop using it is a fruitless endeavour. Not to mention all the racists and homophobes and attention seekers it seems to attract.

      And for me it’s my only way of communicating with many of my friends

      • Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        19 days ago

        only way of communicating with many of my friends

        A big joke around here is you can send me a carrier pigeon. But aside from this, do yall not have phone numbers? Your main form of communication with your friends is through instagram and it’s the only way?

        • gmtom@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          19 days ago

          Yes of course I have a phone number, I also have an email address and a PO box and a slack account etc. but I’m not going to be the guy expecting people to go out of their way to use a different messaging system just to message me, because what would just happen is my friends just bother to talk to me less. Especially if it’s someone I’ve just met who doesn’t have an existing relationship to me.

          • verifiedbyme@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            19 days ago

            Do you really think your friends and family don’t like/love you enough to install an app for you, like Signal, or wouldn’t bother to open any other messenger? Just think about it for a moment. That would be very sad and is probably not true.

  • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 days ago

    Rise up and take the power back.

    It’s time the fat cat’s had a heart attack.

    You know their time’s coming to an end…we have to unify and watch our flag ascend.