• @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    80
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    My stubborn position is that all fruits are vegetables.

    Anything that comes from a plant (vegetation) is a vegetable.

    EDIT: Reading up on the case, they apparently didn’t treat fruits and vegetables as disjoint sets but rather with fruits as a subset of vegetables. So far, so good…

    HOWEVER, they also apparently ruled that tomatoes don’t count as a fruit because they aren’t eaten for dessert…

    Wow… just… wow.

    • MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown
      link
      fedilink
      243 months ago

      because they aren’t eaten for dessert

      This sounds to me like a reasonable way to disqualify something as a culinary fruit.

      Folks like to make a big hullabaloo about tomatoes being technically a fruit, but no one gives a second thought about referring to peppers, cucumbers, green beans, eggplant, avocado, pumpkins & other squash, or corn on-the-cob as vegetables even though they are all technically fruit.

      And I was being picky there, because beans, peas, grains and nuts are all also technically fruit. Heck, lots of “nuts” like peanuts and cashews aren’t even really nuts.

      Keep your taxonomy out of my kitchen:

      • Fruit are sweet.
      • Vegetables are not.
      • Grains make bread.
      • Herbs and spices add a lot of flavor with a little bit. Herbs are the green ones.
      • nuts are. They just are. Don’t think about it too hard.
      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        33 months ago

        Fruits are edible seed pods. Nuts are inedible seed pods but have edible seeds.

        Fruit makes wine.

        Grain makes beer

        Nuts in the right contexts make nougat, nut paste or babies.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        Wait, you’ve found one! I consider peppers their own thing, culinarily speaking anyway, neither fruit nor vegetable.

        The rest of your bullet points I basically agree with, but there’s also

        • peppers are peppery, not always hot, red bell are sweet, and green bell tastes like feet.

        • seeds are seedy, don’t think about the difference between them and nuts, some questions are not for mortal man.

        • Ephera
          link
          fedilink
          English
          133 months ago

          Both of those are sweet and fruit…?

            • @[email protected]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              33 months ago

              You are buying shitty pineapple. To select a good pineapple:

              Tug at the center most leaf on top of the fruit, it should give easily. It should smell like pineapple. The skin should be golden colored to slight green (sl underripe) or a very slight touch brown (overripe). The bottom should be dry. The very green ones that you can get for $2-3 never ripen properly as they were picked too early.

          • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            They’re not fruits by culinary definition.

            Unless you eat them like oranges?😯

            In that case, seek help.

            Edit: On a serious note, I guess this is cultural difference?

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    283 months ago

    Vegetables aren’t actually a thing though. Just a bunch of things we grouped because we like eating them.

        • grissino
          link
          fedilink
          English
          23 months ago

          “Taxonomists aren’t the only people who give meaning to words”

          Eloquently put! You’ve expressed a feeling that I have had for a while now and couldn’t quite put into the appropriate words! Thanks 🙏🏼

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        True. They are just water based government drones, to keep tabs on the mermaid population

  • Nougat
    link
    fedilink
    263 months ago

    Botanical vs culinary. Different contexts; different definition per context. There is not a problem here.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    103 months ago

    It doesn’t matter why are you roleplaying as a botanist if you don’t see that culinary definitions and scientific classification are two separate things. One is really useless for the average person and the other is probably also a foreign concept to everyone having quirky discussions about whether or not cakes are hotdogs or smoothies, because they are the type of people to tweet a 60 page essay about why expecting neurodivergents people to cook their own meal should be considered a hate crime.

  • IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    They’re also a Native American food that was made famous by Italians, celebrated by the Spanish, honoured by the French, used by the English and turned into Ketchup by the Americans … another bit of multicultural history of America.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    What’s the deal with the background? Screenshots aren’t what they used to be, back in my day the worst that could happen was for the image to turn into a pixelated mess after being re-uploaded 1000 times.

    Now I sometimes see images getting tilted by 5%, random words crossed out in yellow, and whatever the fuck happened here.

    • niftyOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      33 months ago

      Idk, I stole the meme from somewhere

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    “Fruit” within culinary is usually applied to “sweeter” forms of fruits, and the more savory forms usually get called “vegetable” instead regardless of being botanically called fruits or not.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      203 months ago

      Almost changed the definition of pi. It passed the House, but a professor from Purdue happened to be in the Statehouse on unrelated business the day the Senate voted on it. He managed to convince enough Senators that it was a terrible idea and they absolutely roasted it on the floor.

      The Wikipedia article on it is great. “Legislative History” is the interesting bit. My favorite part is this:

      An assemblyman handed [Prof. Waldo] the bill, offering to introduce him to the genius who wrote it. He declined, saying that he already met as many crazy people as he cared to.