• turnip@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Calls to violence you mean?

        You want a circlejerk with no barriers, whereas I wish we could discuss the reasons why hes putting in tariffs and cutting spending. Project 2025 versus ETS2 for instance, or the fact China is buying fewer and fewer treasuries every year; leading to higher borrowing costs on leveraged economies globally as money is sucked into the US, to fund the spending they also cant afford.

        Even the global demographics look bleak given the amount of debt we’ve taken on, and people are still living in an MMT fantasyland as they roll over their mortgages from 2% to 6%.

        • phx@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah those tariffs on Canada are certainly going to help that, and he certainly never said they’d be lifted if Canada became a, what was it? Ah yes, “beloved 51st state”

          As for 6% mortgages, that’s not a particularly high number actually. If you went in a 2% expecting that to last forever, maybe.

    • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s not really how a general strike works. You can’t just post on the internet “do a general strike” and expect it to happen or be effective. Where are the strike funds to help feed people and pay their rent when they stop getting paychecks? Where are your strike captains to organize demonstration events? Where is your army of strike lawyers to defend people when they inevitably get arrested?

      General strikes take a long time and a lot of resources to plan. Only then can one be effective.

        • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And you’re never going to get people on board if the solution (general strike) doesn’t meet their material needs. If people have to starve and lose their homes while under threat of arrest or more violent action, you need a way to support them or they won’t stick with it. Revolutions are built on mutual aide and community organizing, not empty platitudes and gumption. Or, worse yet, shit posting and cynicism.

          • Jhex@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            then fascism it is, sadly you are waaaay past signs and petitions

            hopefully I’m wrong

              • Jhex@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Not buying American, cancelling trips to NY, being extra Canadian

                I hope the best for you and all of us but I fear if your revolution awaits for someone to organise it so that it’s painless and requires no sacrifices, it’ll simply never happen

  • AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just watched a video from one f the big networks. They had originally done a story about the protest in Boston talking about 10,000-30,000 strong, despite organizers estimating much higher. This video revised attendance in Boston to 100,000

      • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Why not gather the masses outside their mansions? Why do people keep gathering at the most calculatedly ineffectual areas where they’re ignored time and time again?

        • CircaV@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          They are gathering on a Saturday when trunps playing golf in Florida.

          • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Ikr? Those protestors really went out of their way (on their day off) to really stick it to trump (who was happily playing golf). Goes to show how ineffective and purely symbolic these protests are.

            • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              You do realize these are regular ass people who have jobs and rent and mortgages and bills to pay and kids to support? Like, we can’t be out on the street every single day.

              How often are you out in the streets?

              • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’ve been out protesting for 14 years before last august when a fascist pig threw a brick at my knee during the pogroms in the UK. Now I can’t walk and have been diagnosed with numerous autoimmune disorders, so I physically can’t even leave my house. Perhaps it’s too much to ask you to pick up the torch.

                And for the record, you’re already seeing MAGA rat out anti-MAGA to deport them, pretty soon you’ll be seeing anti-MAGA reporting other anti-MAGA to protect themselves from MAGA, and the “I have kids to take care of” crowd will be the first to turn on their own for the sake of self preservation. Your job, rent, mortgage, bills, and kids are all at stake here, and more of a reason to start knocking on the oligarchs door. Are you saying you prefer your own protection vs the future for your children?

                “Mommy/daddy, did you fight for our future?” “No, I continued going to work because the mortgage was more important.”

                • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Is your argument is that anyone who is unwilling to nuke their entire life for the movement is insufficiently motivated and shouldn’t even bother getting involved?

                  If that’s your stance, then you’re just plain wrong and you should probably keep quiet about it because your working against the movement.

                  Vanguard revolutions don’t work. They just replace one set of shitty authoritarians with another. The ONLY way this can ever work is if we make the movement accessible to as broad a swath of people as humanly possible.

                  I’ve been a political activist for 22 years now. I cut my teeth on the front lines of the anti-Iraq War movement in 2003. I was at Occupy. I spent my early-to-mid 20s with little regard for my personal safety and financial stability. But nobody keeps that up forever. I’m pretty sure I did it longer than most. But that’s not all I want from life.

                  Yes, fighting fascism is important to protecting my kids’ future (I have 2 kids). You know what else is equally important to that, though? Making sure they have a stable home and food on their plates now. And I can’t do that if I nuke my life by spending every single day in the streets, losing my job, and getting arrested.

                  My kids won’t have to ask me what I did because they’re there with me. Both my 3 yo and 5 yo were at the DC protest on Saturday. And this wasn’t either of their first action. My 5 yo was with us at the 2020 uprising when she was less than a year old.

                  A successful movement takes all kinds. Yes, there are some who can take greater risks and more radical actions, but I’m not at that place in my life anymore and that’s fine. If we can’t find a way to include people who have other responsibilities in life, too, without insulting them or implying they’re not really interested in change, then the entire movement is cooked.

                  So, thank you for your past service to the cause, but if you don’t have anything constructive to say, kindly fuck off.

              • CircaV@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Don’t let the rise of fascism get in the way of a days work I guess?

                • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Don’t limit the size of your movement or it’s popular support because you’re unwilling to include people who aren’t able nuke their lives. If I don’t keep my job my children go hungry and lose their home. I’m unwilling to do that to them.

        • obvs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Have you ever been to the U.S.? We can’t all drive 3,000 km. We live in a country with drastically lower population density than European countries.

          • in4apenny@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            People drove across the country to go to Washington yesterday, organizers supplied coaches from every major city. Same with BLM, Occupy, and many movements before it. But god forbid we do that towards a location that could actually make a difference.

            • WraithGear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              People downvote, but i am not very convinced that the protest will do anything. I also wonder why we protest where we do and when we do. I suppose the intention is that we are still in the politicians fuck around part, but not quite up to politicians find out part.

              Hopefully i am proven wrong and something will happen, but even then i fear that people will settle for things being only nominally worse then normal after the scalding.

    • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s been a couple of decades since I’ve lived in the states, but I used to watch some US TV, via satellite and later cable (TV through fiber, actually) I stopped watching US TV 2-3 years prior to COVID. I just can’t stand it. Regular TV is pretty bad worldwide, but US TV is on another level of bad.

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stop watching that trash. The US has awesome media outlets that have been widely covering US protests.

      • Treczoks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        For heavens sake, I’m not a regular watcher of US mainstream “media”. There is only so much junk a human can stand. I was just observing the coverage of this particular event out of curiosity what they would do about it.

    • VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      These are the precursors to a general strike. There’s are a lot of great people out here building support networks for when it finally happens.

      Please come get involved!

    • downvote_hunter@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Their mansions are in gated communities with security keeping out the “undesirables”. Remember “I really don’t care, do you” is the truth about them.

    • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is to show the people who are feeling alone with their despair, that they are in fact not alone.

      And it is to recruit people for the upcoming general strike.

      For a general strike to take effect, it needs about 10mil people, and it is estimated that there are about 5mil people demonstrating in America today.

    • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      No but it’s the first step. As momentum builds more people are emboldened to protest, and the scope of the protests widen and get more effective.

      This sort of statement is typically made by people who want to stall and prevent action. You see it all the time in various forums: “if this activity doesn’t 100% fix everything immediately then there is no point in doing anything”.

      Unfortunately we don’t live in a black and white world where a switch can be flipped from awful to wonderful (as if it was even possible for everyone to agree on that). You get there in small incremental steps with messy interactions and disagreements along the way.

      Protests like this can lead to ongoing effective resistance like strikes, work to rules and etc. But you don’t get someone to go from never having protested in their lives to manning a blockade of a govt building in one step.

      • Sirius006@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly. For the past month I’ve read many people here saying protest are useless because of various bullshit reasons. Protest are just a starting point. At protest, people talk, organize, that can lead to more massive protest, a new ideology, a revolution, or nothing. You never know.

        I’m French. I have been to many protests. Some ended in massive movement for no reasons. Some died while the cause was very important. You never know.

    • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      you speak truth and they downvote it because they don’t want to face that fact that one day of standing around accomplishes nothing. they want to think this will be easy and won’t require real sacrifice. they’re lazy and naive.

      please bookmark this post. show me what changes one month from now. one year from now. please prove me wrong.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        they want to think this will be easy and won’t require real sacrifice. they’re lazy and naive.

        That’s not at all what the responses (that have been up for hours before you posted this) have been saying.

      • VanillaFrosty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        because they don’t want to face that fact that one day of standing around accomplishes nothing.

        Well it’s a good thing it hasn’t been just one day, and there are many more planned for the future. Come get involved!

      • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you can’t even bother to stand around to protest, how tf are you supposed to get people to do more extreme actions when the time such drastic actions are required comes around? Your apathetic response to protesting will only lead to a more fractured society that cannot attempt any meaningful resistance to the fascist in the white house.

          • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            People who are serious doesn’t balk at the idea of protesting. If you can’t even bother sacrificing time to sit around to show people that its safe for them to come fight against fascism, there is no way you’d have the guts to sacrifice your life to actually fight against the fascist when the time comes. It’s probably better if you just sit at home and don’t bother talking about fighting or protesting. At this point, you’re more of an asset to the fascists than anything, even if you didnt know it yet.

            • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              how about i do WTF i want? you’re not the judge of what works and what doesn’t. please. bookmark this comment. come back to me in a year and prove how i was wrong. the proof is in the pudding, pacifist.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                how about i do WTF i want? you’re not the judge of what works and what doesn’t.

                Says the person judging what other people do, and what works and what doesn’t.

              • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Can you even read? I said your type of action is what will result in protests being ineffective at uniting the people that will fight against fascism.

                People failing to remove fascism a year from now will only prove me right if you still decide to continue what you’re doing. To prove your point, you would need to join up with the protest and stop trying to kill it in its infancy and still fail to remove fascism.

                So go ahead and continue what you’re doing and you might prove me right.

                • Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  if the people don’t have the spine for what it takes, then it’s hopeless.

                  have you ever considered that a lot of these people are going to feel defeated after they waste their time protesting and nothing gets accomplished? there’s no guarantee that getting a bunch of people together for feelgood BS leads to more effective resistance. this is the same as saying “just go to college and follow your dreams and everything will magically work out”. it’s a lie. people need to understand where western civilization is at.

  • DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wonderful, dear US friends!

    A powerful sign against all the hatred and corruption that Trump and his henchmen stand for.

    I think large demonstrations like this are incredibly important, especially nowadays, because the manipulation in social media and the traditional media can so easily give the false impression that a majority would share the inhumane ideology of this regime.

    For the tens of thousands on the streets, it is obvious how many decent people there actually are.

    Trump and his opinion makers can do little about this - apart from their usual ridiculous conspiracy theories around Soros and other such Bogus. Because not even these unscrupulous fascists can (yet) dare to stop thousands and thousands of people from demonstrating, or even have them all arrested.

    Good luck and all the best from Europe!

    • WuceBrillis@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is not tens of thousands.

      D.C alone has an estimated 100.000 people marching.

      Nationwide the number is believed to be 5 million, i read somewhere.

    • ABC123itsEASY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Thank you; finally someone from Europe that sees Americans are struggling to fight. Over there you’re unlikely to see the whole picture about what’s going on. I understand that Europeans are mad and I don’t blame them, but I wish more Europeans understood that division is exactly what the powers want and your media is likely being manipulated as well, albeit to perhaps a much lesser degree, in order to sow that division.

  • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really don’t like the amount of violence being suggested here. Trump needs to be removed but a lot of you are suggesting to support violent fantasies.

    By the way that’s a very strong tactic be terrifically Republicans to make the left look unhinged. And they’re correct. It will turn a lot of people against you. Most are not violent people.

    • redwattlebird @lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The point of making the ‘left’, or any opponent, look unhinged is to pressure them into submission. The reason why this works very well is because your media is complicit in amplifying any wrongdoings by any opponents and twisting the perception.

      i mean, check out protests in Europe and how they’re framed by their media. Even your Vietnam war protests back in the day; your media started banging on about them being drug users and layabouts to make dismissing their cause much easier.

      I just think Americans have lost a lot of people power if you have to protest while walking on eggshells. Best thing to combat it is to have a conversation with everyone. Get people chatting face to face rather than having the TV spout nonsense at them.

      • Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        There’s one of the worst ways in modern times to get any message across. It’s like suggesting we use carrier pigeons to communicate on a battlefield.

        The Internet exists. Hey did the Republicans protest in the streets to get their message across?

        I didn’t see that yet every single person I know could reiterate almost all their talking points. If protests were stuff an effective medium for creating supporting and spreading a cause, how did they accomplish it without it.

        Republicans hired think tanks. Same way the cigarette company did you delay laws. Same way energy companies did to delay and sew distrust on climate change.

        The left for all the geniuses they say they are have not adapted to the modern world. Imagine if every single person at these protests stayed home instead and shit posted on every platform they could. That’s how you get messages out in modern times. You use the algorithms. You create content. You boost signals.

        What you do not do is drag people into the streets banging pots. It’s not the 1960s

        Everyone is online. You need people burying their signals and amplifying our own. You need memes. You need everyone to force their hand. The fucked up thing is they have such entrenched culture that you’d think it’s obvious where to apply pressure. It’s not calling them a Nazi. It’s culture jamming our society so we associate trucks with femininity. They are more sensitive than ever and it should be easy to find their soft spots. Can’t hit it from the middle of the road

        • redwattlebird @lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          What you do not do is drag people into the streets banging pots. It’s not the 1960s

          Are you sure? I’m pretty confident that’s what happened on the weekend.

          Also, relying on technology owned and controlled by the billionaire class is a bit rich…

          Anyway, I don’t want to antagonise you. Just don’t discount the traditional methods of communication thinking it’s ineffective. In a world where privacy is almost non-existent and you’re constantly being monitored, going analogue is one of the best tactics there is.

    • Griff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. The peaceful inclusive protest in Sackets Harbor, NY over the weekend worked. The immigrant children and their mother are being returned from Texas as I type this. Don’t give Trumpy any room to paint the left as unhinged.

      • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        You mean the US representatives that won’t set term limits? The US representatives that won’t vote to outlaw insider trading? The US representatives who own businesses that benefit from their legislation? Those people? Just gotta be clear here. Because I’m feeling a little uncertain about their loyalties at the moment. At least towards their voters… To their donors, I’m rock solid on where they owe their fealty.

        • Fredthefishlord@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Term limits(for congress) aren’t an issue. It’s outright good to have a portion of reps with institutional knowledge on how to run a government, and extremely helpful in diplomacy with other countries as well.

          Age limits are the real issue to push, because geriatric fucks being in charge is the real danger.

          Everything else, I wholly and completely agree with you on

          • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I would prefer a slightly incompetent but well meaning person to lead, than someone malicious and skilled. With the former, they will be willing to acknowledge their mistakes or what people want, while the latter would play shell games while pocketing the riches of the people.

            Term and age limits are needed, so that evil people cannot build a nest made out of the government. What we lose in raw efficiency, we regain from a lack of corruption.

      • vvilld@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        There were multiple US House Representatives as the protest in DC on Saturday. Several spoke on the stage and others were out in the crowd.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      What makes you think they didn’t?

      75 million people voted for Harris. We likely won’t know the count of today’s protests, but I feel safe saying it was far fewer than 75 million.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The estimate was 5 million people across 1300 cities.

        A lot of people complaining about these protests seem to think that level of coordinated protesting isn’t impressive.

        Those numbers alone should make anyone stop and think about what’s going on.

      • Chrispyswords@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Let’s not forget that there are more than two choices. I understand there is certainly a duopoly, but that only continues as long as we continue voting for only one or the other.

    • John@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Oh look, another liberal blaming eveybody and anybody except the traish-tier Democrat platform/candidate.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      “proper action wasn’t taken in the past therfore I won’t accept any action being taken in the future.”

  • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    it’s everywhere

    And they are doing what that is useful? The amount of people in any of these pictures could easily enter the White House and unseat Trump, yet here we they are, performativelizing.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Attack the head of the snake and chances are you’ll get bit. He’ll be in a chopper before a window gets broken and the National Guard will be there in minutes.

      The GOP are getting cold feet, Musk is close to leaving, and Trump is starting to throw his appointees under the bus. Sorry you probably won’t get to see Trump tied up and crowd surfed into a van to never be seen again but this is the process.

      • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sorry you probably won’t get to see Trump tied up and crowd surfed into a van to never be seen again but this is the process.

        Sure, whatever process that works works. My point is I’m not seeing a process - I’m no seeing progress. Just complaining, which is something the elites can already and have always burrowed their heads in the sand at.

        • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The process is broken because the people in charge of the processes hadn’t had a reminder that the American people wants them to perform their job. This is that reminder. In order for the reminder to be more effective, we need more people to join in, not more people trying to douse cold water on the movement just to promote more drastic actions that lacks the foundation to do anything effective. You want people to be able to drag fascists out of the White House if the situation calls for it? Then, you need more people that is able to fight against fascism. Easiest method to do that is to protest together and show more people that there is enough people fighting against it for them to come out fighting as well.

    • Sprocketfree@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Classic astroturfing right here. “let’s bitch about people getting involved but not yet murdering people!” cut this shit out. And get involved!

      • theLetterJ@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Also classic astroturfing is complaining about astroturfing. Fact is you never know who posts a comment. But mostly, I agree with your sentiment here.

      • Klear@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Doesn’t look like that. I skimmed the profile very briefly, and it looks like a bad take on an otherwise active and normal account.

    • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I do agree that the resistance needs to become more radical, but you don’t just enter the seat of power and unseat the democratically elected president. Like it or not he still has a popular mandate and that needs to be destroyed first; that’s ultimately what civic resistance is all about. Also he has armed security, which can just shoot any intruders in part because of said popular mandate.

      • Venia Silente@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Like it or not he still has a popular mandate and that needs to be destroyed first;

        Okay, then how? Because from what I have seen pretty much every official in a position of civil service just resigns to let Trump do as he pleases, so there’s not much of a resistance. Who in civil service is supposed to unseat Trump? DOGE is certainly not gonna do it.

        • NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who in civil service is supposed to unseat Trump?

          Absolutely nobody. Trump’s mandate has to be destroyed by widespread popular resistance. Think what Ukraine and Tunisia did and Turkey is doing right now.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And they are doing what that is useful?

      Protesting, making their voices heard. Showing the world that not all Americans are fascists.

      The amount of people in any of these pictures could easily enter the White House and unseat Trump

      You clearly don’t have any idea how overzealous the security in and around the white house is.

      Even IF they somehow got to the oval office after suffering hundreds if not thousands of casualties, the Mango Mussolini would have long since been whisked into a bunker and secret service and the military would arrest or kill all of them.

      yet here we they are, performativelizing

      The first person part was correct, the plural wasn’t. What’s performative is your insistence that the obviously impossible is easy.

      • SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Would it even get that far? Gathering that many people in one spot, at the same time, with a coherent plan would take… a lot of communication. And we know for a fact that the spooks are listening in.

        But, hell, @[email protected], start organizing people. I’m interested in seeing how far it gets.

      • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Honestly though. I thought it would take hundreds of casualties to get into the capital building. And really, is trump actually in the white house much? Golf ain’t going to play itself. But these protests build up the confidence of people who want to do more. It makes them feel like the people are behind them. So maybe these are warm ups for taking the white house.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          I thought it would take hundreds of casualties to get into the capital building

          It would have if they hadn’t been almost exclusively white members of the MAGA cult. One reason why there were so few cops hindering them was that Trump ordered a standdown, and another was the fact that there were more cops participating in the coup attempt than resisting it.

          If it had been a diverse leftist group, you better believe there’d be both cops and military shooting to kill rather than the suspiciously restrained tactics employed that day.

    • slickgoat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      You want the people to “Maga hat” riot the white house? You think that’s the plan?

      Were you dropped on your head as a baby?

    • Brkdncr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s performative.

      It’s the same reason sports games have hype crews in the form of bands or a cheer squad. It livens the audience up.

      In politics it also sends a message to their reps that they could/should be a little bit more aggressive in promoting what their people are saying.

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s really sad how domesticated the American people have become.

    Any of these 1000+ protests could have used their manpower in one day to remove everyone close to Trump.

    Instead we will keep marching and holding signs while everything gets worse and our corporate leaders tell us to wave the signs higher…

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we removed him by force with only something like 1.5% of the population on board, we’d have kicked off a civil war we could not win. Right now, it’s more important to use protest as an outreach tool to get more of the population to support change.

      • boonhet@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well the civil war wouldn’t be 98.5% vs 1.5%. I reckon it would be fairly even, maybe even a bit more on the anti-Trump side, despite the fact that some people might not agree with violence. If forced to pick sides, I reckon most will stay on the same side of the political spectrum they’re already on.

        However

        I agree that civil war should be avoided. But at the same time I recognize some amount of violence may be required in the end, to have a true “liberation day” for Americans. Trump’s not stepping down as long as he’s alive and free.

              • ijedi1234@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                The IRA’s only mistake was that they stopped planting bombs to take out the Imperialists. They were good guys fighting an evil foreign oppressor; of course things wouldn’t be sunshine and rainbows all the time. It’s just as justified as the Revolutionary War.

                Think about it: Would you rather take some evil people with you to the Great Beyond, or would you like some evil people to suck away all your savings as you die a slow death?

    • ABC123itsEASY@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      How the hell are you suggesting that a single group of 10,000 to 100,000 people can “use their manpower in one day to remove everyone close to Trump”?? Are you saying that the January insurrections were a good idea? The tough part you’re not considering is that to preserve (what’s left) of democracy we need to continue abiding by its principles as frustrating as it might sound. We need democracy intact after this is all over. One could almost infer that your comment seeks to invite violence.

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        “A body remains at rest, or in motion at a constant speed in a straight line, unless it is acted upon by a force.”

      • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        So once you garner massive support do nothing meaningful to change things, that’s the right way to protest the government according to the government.

        This is what I mean by domesticated

        • null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you want a group of people to storm the halls of office and seize power by force you’re talking about a coup.

          In this case, the demonstration of dissatisfaction by so many people is meaningful.

          That “feeling” needs to build to a cacophony that republicans just can not ignore. The whole country (aside from perhaps a few loyalists) needs to be in agreement that the republicans are not fit to govern.

          • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            I thought a coup was when you placed loyalists in all positions of power, you control the news, and declare yourself president for life.

            Huh well guess that wasn’t a coup and there’s no problem.

            War is peace Freedom is slavery