• MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Harris was a leader she would be out there touring like AOC. Shes not a leader. She had her shot to prove otherwise and didn’t.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If she were out there touring people would tell her to shut up and sit down. She had her shot, twice, nobody wants what she’s selling.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, if I were her I’d feel drained and devastated. Everything that happened during the election and people still picked Trump over her…

      • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. I have a lot of problems with Kamala The Cop. But she lost what might be the final election in American History. That takes a lot out of you

      • MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I have a hard time feeling sorry for her after leaving the left hanging and going after conservative votes. She made an incredibly poor strategic choice and it cost all of us.

        Obviously she’s not the only one to blame here, conservatives deserving the majority of blame followed by people that stayed home, but she doesn’t deserve pity.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Pity maybe not, but understanding definitely. If that were me ya’ll picked Trump over I’d tell all ya’ll to fuck right off while I prep a boat to Europe. Then all the people saying I should stay out of it would be bitching that I’m not participating anymore.

          • Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly. If I were her, I’d fuck off to Europe and send a big fat middle finger to everyone asking for help.

            Is that in the best interests of the American people? No. Is it an entirely understandable reaction? Yes.

            • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.worldBanned from community
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              1 year ago

              If I were her, I’d fuck off to Europe and send a big fat middle finger to everyone asking for help.

              Sending a big fat middle finger to everyone asking for help was basically her campaign.

          • BombOmOm@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A recount requires a vote to be close, it wasn’t. Trump won every swing state. And with the margins he won by, every recount in the world would not overcome the 86 EVs she trailed by.

            • aceshigh@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The election results were very close - and it was a big election, some ballots were rejected, there were bomb threats and there were also statistical anomalies. She should have asked for a recount.

      • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        They cheated, and we ALL know it. If she’s upset about anything, it’s that she was cheated out of her historic legacy, and the spineless Democratic party backed HitlerPig over her.

      • jollyrogue@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If I were her, I would have had a plan B knowing what the right wingers were up to, and it should have looked a lot like what Bernie and AOC are doing. Instead she showed up then fucked off to somewhere else after hanging out with Dick Cheney for a few months.

      • Vespair@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Exactly why she’s not a leader. A leader understand that you don’t have time to lick you wounds when the enemy is at your door. She should be fighting harder now, not sulking.

      • Kaboom@reddthat.comBanned
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        If she’s still drained and devastated months after losing, she’s not emotionally mature enough to be president. What’s going to happen the first time a soldier gets killed in combat? At least Hillary has some cajones, Harris never gave me that impression.

        • Eugene V. Debs' Ghost@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          At least Hillary has some cajones, Harris never gave me that impression.

          Hillary had years of experience on the federal level. Senator and then Head of State. She was used to making choices that had a big impact.

          I will always remember Harris for her DNC nomination debate performance. She personally called out Biden’s racist policies and how it impacted her. Showing that out of touch white men have lasting impacts on generations children. It was her highest moment. If you check articles they’ll say that was one of the highlights of the event.

          And then became Biden’s VP. Just willing to ignore how he personally wrote a racist bill that harmed you because it’s a position of power? Alright. That’s sure a message about your morals.

          And when asked about why by Steven Colbert: “It was a debate!”

      • al_Kaholic@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Drained and devastated but willing to lose again? Spray this turd down the drain of your empathy and out of a leadership roll.

    • aceshigh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Completely agree. It would have demonstrated that she would have been a good president and it would have sealed the deal for her (if there are legit elections). She didn’t step up. AOC did. Says a lot about each of them.

    • Like when she was up there giving her chatgpt, “make me sound inspirational” concession speech rather than just being mad as hell like the rest of us. She’s plays leader but she will sit in the manager cubical while the rest of us eat the company provided cold turkey in the break room the day before Thanksgiving.

    • batmaniam@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Usual: If you voted 3rd party or didn’t vote, you signed off on our current reality.

      But you’re not wrong, and I have plenty to disagree with AOC about, but they’re all conversations for a better time; done and done.

      • Bristingr@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, 3rd party voters at least voted. This solely lies on the folks who didn’t vote.

        • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you voted 3rd party in a FPTP election, you are functionally indistinguishable from a non-voter. You can talk about your principles all you want, but by the mechanics of the electoral system you are exactly equivalent to a non-voter.

          • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Exactly the opposite of reality. FPTP does not preclude third parties from winning, hence the existence of the republican party. It does mean you have to vote your principles and not strategically vote. If everyone voted for the party that most closely aligned with their principles, neither the Dems or repubs would ever wing the presidency and would never hold a majority in any Congress at any level.

            • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Incorrect. I can justify any number of results with such a monumental “if”. Any strategy based on such a large number of people suddenly changing their voting tendency in such a way is unworkable. As one party splinters, the other is heavily incentivized to stay together and easily win. It’s a game of chicken; the first party to break ranks is doomed. People understand this on an intuitive, tribalistic level. Fracturing the less monolithic party will only strengthen the more monolithic one. That is reality.

              Without organization sufficient to convince at least a third of the country that a specific party is viable, you cannot beat a strategic party with principles alone.

              • superniceperson@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hard disagree, as again, the republican party exists. It was a third party.

                Practically no one votes strategically. The vast majority of voters vote the same as their parents and/or peers. The extreme minority of voters that care about issues vote for whatever party of the two that suits them best at the time.

                But bigger than all these groups are the eligible voters that think nothing will change because people like you tell them they only have two options, so they don’t vote.

                Because neither option is good. There is Nazi, and there is the group that appoints nazis. Both exist solely for their own power and wealth. Neither help people until the riots get too violent. So why vote. Why care?

                So either we introduce a third party or more, and maybe give some hope, or we let the uniparty continue to win and we all have to survive a balkanized US when it collapses.

                • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Without organization sufficient to convince at least a third of the country that a specific party is viable, you cannot beat a strategic party with principles alone.

          • TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah fuck people who help dems win local elections and ballot measures! Those things aren’t real! Everyone knows the house and senate don’t matter! And neither do state legislatures! Fuck those stupid things that don’t affect anyone, it’s all about voting for the guy you think is going to win, not the one you want! Or, idk whatever you dems go on about.

            Let’s keep attacking progressive voter base like the DNC wants! Let’s keep alienating them more! It will be a good idea THIS time! It worked so well that’s why 2016 was our best year! Way better than 2008 when we didn’t actively attack them! If we don’t ensure politics is voting against the one you hate most how will we keep all those non-voters at home, keep money in politics, and keep those oligarchs happy!

      • piefood@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nope. I voted 3rd party because I didn’t want Trump, and I also didn’t want Harris. Maybe if Harris had tried campaining on what Americans wanted, rather than trying to win over people who were obviously not going to vote for her, we wouldn’t be here.

        But she chose genocide, money, and the Cheneys over winning an election against one of the least popular presidents we’ve ever had.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I can’t imagine thinking about “serving people” when majority of them turned out to be hateful idiots that frankly deserve getting their faces eaten by a leopard. Let her catch a break maybe?

      • piefood@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Nah, I’m not giving her a break. She handed the elction to Trump on a silver platter. It should have been a slam dunk election, but she chose genocide, money, and the Cheney’s over winning.

      • ExtantHuman@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        The Dipshit didn’t even get the majority of people who did vote, let alone the country as a whole

  • yarr@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    If Kamala couldn’t beat Trump, and AOC is behind her… does that mean she’d win?

  • computerscientistII@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is this wise? As an outside observer I had the impression that Harris lost in part because of systematic, subtle and overt racism and sexism. All this applies to AOC, too. Do the Democrats want to lose? Don’t they have some sort of JFK look-alike, people actually want to vote? It’s not as if appearance wasn’t way more important in the US than things like the actual political agenda.

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    The fact that Kamala is even going to try to run again shows how fucked that party is.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is that shocking because she is as high as second or not higher?

    TBH that sounds completely expected to me. Bernie Sanders never won the DNC primary, idk why anybody would think AOC would unless a major upset happened.

  • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    It feels like everyone is desperate to loose, if someone came up with a contest where winning cost you a lot of money and was nothing but pain and suffering then the race would look exactly the same as it does between dema and reps.

  • MellowYellow13@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Fuck Harris, we have no more time for right wing “liberals.” She needs to get the fuck out of the way and progressives need to take charge

  • MisterCurtis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where the fuck has Harris been this whole time? How has she remained relevant? WTF is wrong with the DNC (gestures wildly at all their dumb shit)?

      • MBech@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        And she seems to have done fucking nothing since then to help the american people. No call to the streets, no speeches at the protests, nothing.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yep, she and Biden just disappeared after conceding. They bowed out so hard they ended up in hiding

          I don’t know why they’re surfacing this week, but they can fuck back to the rock they crawled out from under

  • CoolSouthpaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ayyy. This shouldn’t be a shock. I think AOC should be seen as a favourite to emerge as the Democratic nominee in 2028… if we get an election then.