• 0 Posts
  • 26 Comments
Joined 2 months ago
cake
Cake day: March 9th, 2025

help-circle
rss
  • Unsurprising, given that the dissolution of the Socialist system resulted in extreme increases in poverty, homelessness, prostitution, drug abuse, and 7 million excess deaths.

    Exactly, all because communism paralyzed the economy for a half a century and fixing that mess required more than a decade of hardship.

    But you keep deluding yourself with your nonsense. Why don’t you go to North Korea or Cuba if you like communism so much? I’ll buy you a plane ticket if you can’t afford it.


  • Don’t bother mate. All these people commenting are American radicals. Lemmy has received a massive influx of them after Reddit increased its moderation standards. I wish there was a social media platform made just for Europeans so I wouldn’t have to listen to Americans constantly.

    As a Romanian myself I could tell them about the horrendous living conditions my relatives had to go through during communism, but it won’t matter. They’ll still chant their nonsense like some drugged priests.

    Communism is horrible. It didn’t work, it doesn’t work and it will never work.

    Go on you losers. Downvote me all you want.




  • I already own a FP3 and that’s what I am going to use until it breaks.

    That’s fair. I can get behind that.

    I might consider Graphene in the future, but having to buy a Google phone (even a used one) already pisses me off, compared to a FP (or similar).

    You’re not the only one. I loathed that I had to go back to Google to switch to Graphene, but life’s a compromise most of the time.

    eOS also tries to be a “noob-friendly” distribution, that you can buy phones with and you never have to mess with the phones, which means people who don’t have the skills or don’t want to mess with their phones might trade the risk with ease of operation, and it might be the right choice for them.

    Graphene does that well too. I’ve been using it for a few weeks now and I never had to look up guides like I’m doing for Linux.


  • If these two issues are what prompts you to call a “security dumpster fire”, I would say we at least have very different risk perceptions.

    We do. I can’t in good conscience recommend it as an alternative to friends or relatives when even stock Android has improved security. I can’t speak for your social circle, but all the people I know update their phones accordingly. Maybe they delay the update for a few days, but they don’t stay months with their phones like that. Fairphones improve the situation a bit since you can lock the bootloader, but the substantial delay in security updates is still a major risk.

    I don’t get why anyone would choose /e/OS over Graphene if they had the option. Graphene offers the highest security and privacy, it works wonderful and most banking apps support it. /e/OS just has the advantage of supporting more models, but if you can get a Pixel what’s the point?







  • or be our enemy

    That would be a geopolitical disaster for the US. No matter how much he yaps his mouth around, Trump doesn’t want the EU as an adversary. If that were to happen the US would have 2 flanks to defend against instead of one. And the EU is not Russia. Collectively the EU has the second biggest military budget and the third biggest economy in the world.

    Trump is trying to get us to increase centralization at the EU level which is great as far as I’m concerned. But that chucklenut is doing it in a way that will also massively sour relations in the long term. As insane as it sounds, if Trump’s successor is going to be like him, China will probably be a more reliable partner than the US. The only caveat is that Taiwan is going to be extremely vulnerable in such a situation.

    I’m hoping the US will come to its senses at the next election and relations will normalize. The Americans are pricks, but they are still more ideologically aligned with us than the Chinese.


  • For you why did fascism emerge in the first place

    That’s a broad question that has different answers depending on the time and place. There’s no single answer to this.

    why did it re-emerge nowadays.

    Again, it’s a broad question with different answers. However, I can definetly say that social media and selection bias play a role in pushing the average person to extreme views such as yours. Which is why I’d like to remind people to take a break and cool down every once in a while.


  • You think that people who actually want to learn new things are the fascists?

    He didn’t say that. He just gave an example (a rather poor one given the context) of people lacking solidarity.

    I’d ask you if you are dumb but you already answered that with your class skipping

    Insulting people like this won’t get you anything.

    Not everybody sees teachers like evil oppressors jfc

    Again, he never said this. Forgive me for saying this, but it seems you’re very angry about something and you just want to start an argument. Maybe take a break from the internet for a day?



  • Wait, you think Putin has credibility when speaking on climate change?

    I never said that. I said that to the general public he may appear as more credible based on his behavior when adressing the issue compared to Greta which would undermine environmental efforts. This is what I’m concerned about.

    I can’t imagine a world where you’re calling that “petulant”. At 16 years old she had more poise and gravitas than many of the world leaders she was speaking to. You say she hasn’t done anything. I beg to differ. Further, if what she has done is nothing, it raises the obvious question: what have you done to avert climate catastrophe?

    Ok, usually I welcome debates, but I can see that you were very angry when you wrote this so I think it’s better that we stop here. Before finishing off, I would like to clarify one more time that I’m not a climate change denier. I just don’t like the way Greta and others like her operate since it’s my belief that their aggressiveness undermines the movement and increases the risk of turning people into reactionaries. That’s my opinion. I’m entitled to it just as much as you’re entitled to your own.



  • Greta Thunberg is 22 years old right now, and was “screaming” and “blaming people” when she was 11 years old.

    Expecting an 11 year old to provide answers that none of the established world has is silly.

    Fully agreed.

    She saw the world she was going to inherit and forced conversation to work toward solutions

    I disagree. I saw her speak and the reactions to some of her speeches. Her inflamatory and derogatory speeches did nothing more than help opponents of the energy transition. To give you an example, when asked about it during an interview Putin jumped at the opportunity to discredit the energy transition. While the public saw Greta behaving like a petulant child during the speech, they then saw Putin speaking calmy, asking real questions like “How are poor nations going to transition when they need cheap fossils to sustain themselves?”. They then take this bit and plaster it on every social media site. People see it and are inclined to take Putin’s side since he appears more knowledgeable and in control of himself. And just like that he gets a boost in his reputation.

    This is why I don’t like activists like her and the author of this article. They do more harm than good by expressing themselves in such a violent manner.


  • “listen to the experts who have been screaming at you for 50 years.”

    That would be fine provided that it’s done correctly and civilized. Which is my point. Raising awarness is fine.Throwing insults loudly left and right to raise awareness is not. It only makes you seem delusional and sheds a bad light on your cause. This allows climate change deniers to take advantage of that to further their agenda.