• @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          "Research has identified that the Goatse Man is in fact named Kirk Johnson, or at least goes by that name online. He is the same person who appears on Bottleguy and Detroit Hardcore, as confirmed by the mole at the top left corner of his anus- the chances of another practitioner of anal stretching having a mole in the same place is extraordinarily unlikely. It is this analysis that ties hello.jpg and the contents of gap.zip to the name of Kirk Johnson. It is also a supposed “fact” that Kirk is french, however this is likely to stem from a BME article about anal stretching featuring a french practitioner who is not Kirk Johnson, and therefore this rumour is likely to simply be xenophobia

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          014 days ago

          Even worse than that one nights deep dive into depravity and I found that it wasn’t just one picture. There were many pictures of that guy and his abyss.

    • Pudutr0n
      link
      fedilink
      English
      014 days ago

      They’re usually traced through the fly swatter.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    014 days ago

    That shit was legend. I mean, we were still using BBSs and phone phreaking. Here’s this ubernerd that BROKE INTO the television signal. We bow before you, kinky ubernerd.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      014 days ago

      The power required to do it is impressive to say the least.

      I guess the other option would be that the signal was created with very close proximity to the broadcast tower requiring much less power, but they probably had a limited area to search.

      To me it almost reads like this was a “we technically can, let’s test it out!” And it worked.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        014 days ago

        The latter is essentially how they did it.

        Basically, the TV station didn’t run the high powered broadcast towers directly. They simply beamed the signal over to the tower (using directional antennas) to get amplified. All the hacker did was overpower that (relatively low power) directional antenna signal. It would require being in closer proximity to the tower, but it would at least allow you to get the signal amplified using existing infrastructure, instead of building your own amplifier.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        It would require as much, or more, power to drown out a TV broadcast signal at the source. I believe many of the old towers were 200kW-1000kW so it would have taken one hell of a pirate signal if interfering close to the main source. However, RF follows the same principle as light using the inverse square law so the further you get from the primary transmitter, the signal quickly becomes exponentially weaker for any receiver.

        If you had a TV transmitter on a small hill that is a fair distance away from the target audience, like many were, splitting the distance with a directional antenna wouldn’t require nearly as much power from the pirate signal to overtake the original transmission.

        If I wanted, I could interfere with ham radio signals with as little as a watt of power (in my immediate local area) even though people might be communicating through a ham radio repeater that transmits at a couple of thousand watts that is many miles away. (It’s actually a permitted emergency technique to “break into” active conversations. Actually, other ham radio operators are familiar with what interference sounds like, even for signals that can’t fully overtake a transmission. It’s customary to stop the conversation if detected and wait for the “break”.)

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          014 days ago

          Yeah, growing up there were people with illegal high power CB radios that would bleed into the TV signals near me. And I don’t even know if they’re close to the same band.

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            014 days ago

            Doesn’t need to be in the same band due to harmonics and power. If you keep splitting the 11m band (CB) into “fractional-frequencies”, you are going to get a cross-over somehow, especially if the fundamental is at super-high power.

            Using a piano as an example, if you play a C2 at 62.41Hz it still expresses harmonics at C3 (130.81Hz), G3 (196.22Hz) and C4 (261.63Hz) and at least in theory, to infinity and beyond! Each harmonic away from the fundamental will be expressed in decreasing levels of power. (It’s like 1/3 power per, I think. The proper math is out there though.)

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        014 days ago

        Didn’t they just overpower the radio link to the broadcast site, a much lower power signal than the broadcast signal itself?

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          0
          edit-2
          14 days ago

          (sorry to add even more; I just made another comment about this and I am familiar with most of these concepts.)

          Actually, that would be much easier. TV stations back then mostly received shows via satellite dish. Pointing a low power directional antenna directly at the dish’s LNB would work great. Satellite transmissions weren’t strong and were rarely encrypted back then so that would theoretically be super easy if you knew your RF and deep RF knowledge was much more common place +30 years ago.

          I am not sure if they used point-to-point microwave antennas back then for TV, but it would be the same concept. (Microwave antennas are typically the round, cylindrical looking, covered antennas we see all over the place today.)

          • @[email protected]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            014 days ago

            FWIW, it mentions in the link that the method was via overpowering the analogue microwave link between the station and the broadcast transmitter

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        The power required to do it is impressive to say the least.

        That’s not how the attack worked. He didn’t drown out the tower. He simply overrode the the studio-to-transmitter link signal. The studios used microwave line-of-sight transmitters to communicate a signal from the studio to the tower. All the attacker had to do was override that signal. That signal was 50W max. You could override it with maybe 200W as long as you were also in line-of-sight of the microwave receiver. Probably less since some microwave trasmitters were as weak as 1W. They don’t need to be strong since they are line-of-sight directional transmitters. So, that’s not particularly impressive.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    014 days ago

    Perpetrators, definitely a whole gang of people did that hijacking. At the least 3 if you count the guy on screen, the girl spanking him with a flyswatter, and likely whoever was intercepting the radio signal with their own broadcast. Doubt it was the same guy on the footage.

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        014 days ago

        Something about that footage has always appeared live to me. Its like he didnt even have a script. Just told a friend to spin this metal sheet behind him and have a chick he knows spank him while he attempts some crazy exploit he found himself able to do. But yeah, theres no reason at all it couldn’t have been recorded beforehand, you’re right on that.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          014 days ago

          Its like he didnt even have a script

          I mean, they could have just winged it if recording too. Being recorded doesnt make it any more likely he was prepared

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        014 days ago

        If you watch it, there’s an air of excitement and surprise given off by the person on screen that comes across even though their voice is heavily masked. Makes me think the dude was jacked to the tits when they finally saw it working.

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          014 days ago

          I’ve watched it many times and I agree on the air and vibe. But it doesn’t preclude a prior filming.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    014 days ago

    I mean who hasn’t hijacked the signals of major news networks to fil themselves in a rubber mask being spanked with a flyswatter.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    014 days ago

    Some. Use on Reddit thinks he knows who did it but he couldn’t get him to admit it. It was a long detailed story about an autistic guy that was a brother of a friend.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      014 days ago

      The Reddit story was very convincing at the time. They later did walk it back, something like they believed the brother when they denied doing it.

      I don’t know how conspiratorial we should be, because while the FCC doesn’t play around I think at this point everyone would be more amused and curious if the perpetrator came forward.

  • @[email protected]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    014 days ago

    I wonder why they still haven’t come forward, given that there would be no legal consequences for doing so in 2025.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      0
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      My guess is that they died before the statute of limitations expired. This happened in the 80’s, and there’s plenty of time between then and now for something to have happened to them.

      • SkaveRat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        014 days ago

        Maybe. But if I had to guess, it’s also not really easy to prove, if you didn’t also record some evidence back then.

        “It was Bob and me” isn’t really a good story, if you can’t really show for it. Also, remembering the details on how it was done will also be spotty at best

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          014 days ago

          I’d heard a story years ago that it was an autistic brother of a hacker/phreak in the local Chicago scene actually in the footage; with the hack being carried out by said brother. Another station had their broadcast interrupted that same night, though only audio came through.

          That would go a long way towards explaining why they’ve kept the secret. Involving your bro would be a bad look, or maybe it was a telecom engineer and they’re worried about their pension, or they died. Such a cool moment in time that can’t really happen again and only a handful of people can possibly know the truth.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      014 days ago

      Human ass cheek resonance is unique, like fingerprints. There was no database at the time though.

        • SkaveRat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          014 days ago

          Why don’t you send me a recording and I’ll let you know

        • @[email protected]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          014 days ago

          Please report to your local precinct for spanking fingerprint video session.

          Don’t worry, the video is stored in amazon using military grade aes 256 encryption. The encryption key is located in the same s3 bucket.

  • M137
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    That title makes less sense than the event itself, which is famously weird. I can’t imagine anything other than that being on purpose.

  • Captain Aggravated
    link
    fedilink
    English
    0
    edit-2
    14 days ago

    I love how Brian Brushwood described it. It was either an inside job from someone at the station, or a very impressive feat of radio hacking, and they had to plan out the costume and the corrugated sheet on a pivot behind him to simulate the “CG” backgrounds, “But it’s as if zero thought went into what he was actually going to say.” He hums the Clutch Cargo theme tune, makes fun of Max Headroom as spokesman of New Coke by holding up a Pepsi can, and throws a little bit of shade at WGN and Chuck Swirsky.

    The halcyon days of the 1980’s when a broadcast intrusion like this was basically a harmless juvenile prank.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      014 days ago

      Look at how phone phreaking was treated in the 70s, or codes for getting long distance on BBS. The modern justice system would have wanted to make someone like Joybubbles an example.

      • Krudler
        link
        fedilink
        English
        0
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        My buddy Julian was linked up with our city’s biggest phreakers. Dude disappeared and word is he did 10 years. This was in the 80’s

      • @[email protected]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        014 days ago

        iirc terrorism charges were levied against an activist that threw glitter at police during a demo for climate activists some years ago