For those say in their 60s or 70s here. When you were in your 30’s or 40’s did you have the feeling that the world was a fucked up place? So much has been going on since I entered adulthood in the early 2000s and I feel like it’s getting more and more intense. It’s never ending.

Is it unique? Or has it always been this way?

  • starlinguk@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    70
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    No, no it was not.

    Example: when they found out what caused the hole in the ozone layer, they fixed it.

    If we found out now, people would say that you can’t trust Big Academia or Big Science and nothing would be done. And don’t get me started on vaccinations.

    We’re sliding rapidly backwards.

    People who say it isn’t are just too lazy to do anything.

    • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      5 days ago

      Stopping climate change is ORDERS OF MAGNITUDE harder than protecting the ozone layer. Protecting ozone requires switching the chemicals we used in refrigerants and propellants to other, viable alternatives. That affected products worth, generously, maybe 1% of GDP?

      Stopping climate changing the vast majority of the vehicles on the planet, along with the majority of our electrical power plants. It also necessitates stopping deforestation and overhauling a wide number of industrial processes, including for basic materials like steel and concrete. And that’s not even getting into methane emissions from livestock.

      All of these things add up to a massive chunk of the planets GDP. It’s an extremely heavy lift, and it’s not fair to say that the world has gotten worse because we’re struggling more with climate change than the ozone hole.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        I feel @[email protected] was saying more than that. I don’t recall any serious studies or news articles suggesting the ozone hole was a hoax or that debunking a human cause. Although it was kinda an aside but the anti vaxine thing he points to. I mean one of the most effective medical interventions since soap and sterilization has people acting like its some sort of evil witchcraft that will actually harm you despite the clear evidence both clinical and personal to its effectiveness.

        • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          5 days ago

          I don’t know of any for the ozone hole specifically, but you can look to the fight over cigarettes to see the same science-denying approach during the 50s and beyond. That was literally the blueprint for climate change denial by the fossil fuel industry in later decades.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 days ago

            I think that is an apt comparison and it just outlines the things to me. We really did not know smoking was bad till the 40’s and the 50’s is when it was much more conclusive and the industry was able to push off legislation for like a decade into the 60’s. The greenhouse effect although known for awhile similarly did not really become conclusive till the 50’s and still it was like the late eighties when congressional hearings brought it more into the us public sphere although many folk still did not really know about it till gores 2006 movie put it more into the common culture. The industry fud started with the congressional hearings when there was indication it might lead to regulation. So they have pretty effectively stalled it for the most part for over 30 years! In addition we have had some regulation and then had it pulled back. I think it really highlights the decline compared to before when you look at cigarettes compared to greenhouse gases.

            • LaLuzDelSol@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 days ago

              I guess. You could also look at things like plastic pollution where industry straight up won, and during the 60s-70s successfully pushed the responsibility onto consumers to recycle while continuing to crank out single use plastic with very few restrictions.

              • HubertManne@piefed.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                I don’t think the industry did much there. Consumers were not exactly avoiding plastics. There was kinda a few attempts to avoid them but they did not really go anywhere except for maybe the reusable shopping bags. I have to say I used to love and get the 16 ounce pop bottles that had the deposit that you got back when you brought them back. I would be buying them now if the pop industry had not phased them out. Was still able to get them even in the first year or so of the 90’s. That ones a hard comparison.

                • ButteryMonkey@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  5 days ago

                  My local grocery carries deposit-bottle drinks of some varieties (mostly milk and soda, both of which are produced locally, sometimes tea and other drinks), so they are still around in some cases. I’m also a big fan of grolsch beer because it comes in nice swing-top bottles that are great for use as a home brewer, or for making sauces or whatever you may like them for. The beer itself isn’t that good imo, but it’s basically free with the purchase of bottles, as that’s basically the cheapest way to get swing-top bottles of that size.

                  Very importantly, only the one grocery store carries the glass bottle soda, though there are 4 others within a 10-minute range. So it’s entirely possible that there is somewhere near you that has it and you just aren’t aware of it.

                  • HubertManne@piefed.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 days ago

                    I think its area of the country because I have kept my eye out for over 30 years now and it disapeared. I shop by price so don’t tend to just go to one place for everything.

          • HubertManne@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 days ago

            But at that time the science was just solidifying so overrated was not that contrary to say its overrated or inconclusive or something. Its like at one point there was a microbiologist that thought hiv was a passenger virus and did not cause aids. Which at the time was reasonable given koch’s postulates although they are basically impossible to apply to aids but eventually we had some much evidence built up that it became moot. Which is very similar with global warming. Someone might say we don’t know enough or have done enough studies and that might be reasonable in the 50’s but becomes silly by the 90’s

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        No one could see the ozone hole. We had to believe science and everyone did.

        meanwhile climate change is not just easier to understand, but becoming apparent in everyday life. There’s been an overwhelming consensus in science for half a century. How do people still doubt? Or what kind of hatred could make you actively resist changes to mitigate it?

    • theherk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      You must realize terrible stuff was happening over that time period too. Yes, there is a ton of regression happening right now, but compared to any other time in history some things are better some are worse. One can probably select any two points in modern history and say the same. There are always great and terrible things happening.

      • HubertManne@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 days ago

        I think it depends how we slice it. last century compared to previous. yeah will take this century. this quarter century to the quarter century before. Ill take before. I mean if we are at the tail of of a falling post world war 2 blip that is not a great thing.

      • Tattorack@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 days ago

        But it was still done. Regulations were put in place and corporations were made to comply.

        Tje only place that still happens is here in Europe, and I’m afraid that might begin to deminish soon.